International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 34, Issue 3 , Pages 585-590, 1 February 1996

Analysis of outcome in patients reirradiated for brain metastases

  • William W. Wong, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: William W. Wong, M.D., Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, 13400 E. Shea Boulevard, Scottsdale, AZ 85259.
    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, AZ, USA
  • ,
  • Steven E. Schild, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, AZ, USA
  • ,
  • Timothy E. Sawyer, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Division of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, USA
  • ,
  • Edward G. Shaw, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Division of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, USA
    • Dr. Shaw's present address is as follows: Department of Radiation Oncology, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC.

Abstract 

: Patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases generally benefit from whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT). However, the role of reirradiation for patients who develop progressive bain metastases has been controversial. This retrospective study examines our experience with reirradiation of patients for progressive brain metastases after an initial course of WBRT.

: From 1975–1993, 2658 patients received WBRT for brain metastases at our institution. Eighty-six patients were subsequently reirradiated for progressive brain metastases. The median age of these patients was 58 (range: 31–81). The most common primary sites were breast and lung. Fifty patients had metastatic disease at other sites. Most patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 2 (40 patients) or 3 (38 patients). The median dose of the first course of irradiation was 30 Gy (range: 1.5–50.6 Gy). The median dose of the second course of irradiation was 20 Gy (range: 8.0–30.6 Gy).

: Twenty-three patients (27%) had resolution of neurologic symptoms, 37 patients (43%) had partial improvement of neurologic symptoms, and 25 patients (29%) had either no change or worsened after reirradiation. The median survival following reirradiation was 4 months (range: 0.25–72 months). The majority of patients had no significant toxicity secondary to reirradiation. Five patients had radiographic abnormalities of their brain consistent with radiation-related changes. One patient had symptoms of dementia that was though to be caused by radiotherapy. Various potential prognostic factors were evaluated for possible associations with survival, including age, sex, primary site, ECOG performance status, RTOG neurologic functional class, absence of extracranial metastases, number of brain metastases, and dose of reirradiation. Absence of extracranial metastasis, solitary brain metastasis, and a retreatment dose > 20 Gy were associated with improved survival in univariate analysis (p = 0.025, 0.033, and 0.061, respectively). The absence of extracranial disease was the only significant factor in multivariate analysis (p = 0.05).

: The majority of patients in our series had favorable symptomatic responses. Clinically significant complications were minimal. Reirradiation should be offered to patients who develop progressive brain metastases.

Keywords:  Brain metastasis, Brain irradiation, Reirradiation

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This paper was presented at the 37th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Miami, FL, October 1995.

PII: 0360-3016(95)02156-6

International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 34, Issue 3 , Pages 585-590, 1 February 1996