Volume 69, Issue 3 , Pages 831-838, 1 November 2007
Results of the Phase I Dose-Escalating Study of Motexafin Gadolinium With Standard Radiotherapy in Patients With Glioblastoma Multiforme
Purpose
Motexafin gadolinium (MGd) is a putative radiation enhancer initially evaluated in patients with brain metastases. This Phase I trial studied the safety and tolerability of a 2–6-week course (10–22 doses) of MGd with radiotherapy for glioblastoma multiforme.
Methods and Materials
A total of 33 glioblastoma multiforme patients received one of seven MGd regimens starting at 10 doses of 4 mg/kg/d MGd and escalating to 22 doses of 5.3 mg/kg/d MGd (5 or 10 daily doses then three times per week). The National Cancer Institute Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program toxicity and stopping rules were applied.
Results
The maximal tolerated dose was 5.0 mg/kg/d MGd (5 d/wk for 2 weeks, then three times per week) for 22 doses. The dose-limiting toxicity was reversible transaminase elevation. Adverse reactions included rash/pruritus (45%), chills/fever (30%), and self-limiting vesiculobullous rash of the thumb and fingers (42%). The median survival of 17.6 months prompted a case-matched analysis. In the case-matched analysis, the MGd patients had a median survival of 16.1 months (n = 31) compared with the matched Radiation Therapy Oncology Group database patients with a median survival of 11.8 months (hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.20–0.94).
Conclusion
The maximal tolerated dose of MGd with radiotherapy for glioblastoma multiforme in this study was 5 mg/kg/d for 22 doses (daily for 2 weeks, then three times weekly). The baseline survival calculations suggest progression to Phase II trials is appropriate, with the addition of MGd to radiotherapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide.
Radiotherapy, Glioblastoma multiforme, Radiation enhancer, Motexafin gadolinium, Glioma
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Research supported by the National Cancer Institute Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (Grant RO3 CA 78170); National Institutes of Health supplement to UCLA Johnson Comprehensive Cancer Center Core grant; National Institutes of Health General Clinical Research Center, UCLA (Grant M01-RR00865), General Clinical Research Centers Program; and Pharmacyclics Inc. Comparative analysis supported by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (Grants U10 CA21661, CCOP U10 CA37422), and Stat U10 CA32115 from the National Cancer Institute.
The contents of this manuscript are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Cancer Institute.
Conflict of interest: S.-C. Phan is employed by, and owns stock in, Pharmacyclics, Inc.; J. Ford, M. Mehta, J. Alger, and G. Wu have each received research funding from Pharmacyclics, Inc.; W. Seiferheld, T. Endicott, and W. Curran have no conflicts of interest.
PII: S0360-3016(07)00680-3
doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.04.017
© 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 69, Issue 3 , Pages 831-838, 1 November 2007
