Volume 69, Issue 1 , Pages 230-239, 1 September 2007
Principal Component Analysis-Based Pattern Analysis of Dose–Volume Histograms and Influence on Rectal Toxicity
Purpose
The variability of dose–volume histogram (DVH) shapes in a patient population can be quantified using principal component analysis (PCA). We applied this to rectal DVHs of prostate cancer patients and investigated the correlation of the PCA parameters with late bleeding.
Methods and Materials
PCA was applied to the rectal wall DVHs of 262 patients, who had been treated with a four-field box, conformal adaptive radiotherapy technique. The correlated changes in the DVH pattern were revealed as “eigenmodes,” which were ordered by their importance to represent data set variability. Each DVH is uniquely characterized by its principal components (PCs). The correlation of the first three PCs and chronic rectal bleeding of Grade 2 or greater was investigated with uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses.
Results
Rectal wall DVHs in four-field conformal RT can primarily be represented by the first two or three PCs, which describe ∼94% or 96% of the DVH shape variability, respectively. The first eigenmode models the total irradiated rectal volume; thus, PC1 correlates to the mean dose. Mode 2 describes the interpatient differences of the relative rectal volume in the two- or four-field overlap region. Mode 3 reveals correlations of volumes with intermediate doses (∼40–45 Gy) and volumes with doses >70 Gy; thus, PC3 is associated with the maximal dose. According to univariate logistic regression analysis, only PC2 correlated significantly with toxicity. However, multivariate logistic regression analysis with the first two or three PCs revealed an increased probability of bleeding for DVHs with more than one large PC.
Conclusions
PCA can reveal the correlation structure of DVHs for a patient population as imposed by the treatment technique and provide information about its relationship to toxicity. It proves useful for augmenting normal tissue complication probability modeling approaches.
Prostate cancer, Rectal toxicity, Dose–volume histograms, Principal component analysis, Normal tissue complication probability
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Supported in part by Deutsche Krebshilfe e.V. Grant 106280 and National Institutes of Health Grant RO1 CA091020.Presented in part at the 47th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO), Denver, CO, October 16–20, 2005.Conflict of interest: none.
PII: S0360-3016(07)00795-X
doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.04.066
© 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 69, Issue 1 , Pages 230-239, 1 September 2007
