Journal Home
Search for

Articles in Press

Return to articles in press list

Outcome with Neck Dissection After Chemoradiation for N3 Head-and-Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Levon Igidbashian, M.D.Corresponding Author Informationemail address, Bernard Fortin, M.D., Louis Guertin, M.D., Denis Soulières, M.D., Geneviève Coulombe, M.D., Manon Belair, M.D.§, Danielle Charpentier, M.D., Jean-Claude Tabet, M.D., Phuc Felix Nguyen-Tan, M.D.

Received 24 January 2009; received in revised form 24 April 2009; accepted 8 May 2009. published online 22 September 2009.
Corrected Proof

Purpose

To evaluate the role of neck dissection (ND) after chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) with N3 disease.

Methods and Materials

From March 1998 to September 2006, 70 patients with HNSCC and N3 neck disease were treated with concomitant CRT as primary therapy. Response to treatment was assessed using clinical examination and computed tomography 6 to 8 weeks posttreatment. Neck dissection was not routinely performed and considered for those with less than complete response. Of the patients, 26 (37.1%) achieved clinical complete response (cCR) after CRT. A total of 31 (44.3%) underwent ND after partial response (cPR-ND). Thirteen patients (29.5%) did not achieve cCR and did not undergo ND for the following reasons: incomplete response/progression at primary site, refusal/contraindication to surgery, metastatic progression, or death. These patients were excluded from the analysis. Outcomes were computed using Kaplan-Meier curves and were compared with log rank tests.

Results

Comparing the cCR and cPR-ND groups at 2 years, the disease-free survival was respectively 62.7% and 84.9% (p = 0.048); overall survival was 63.0% and 79.4% (p = 0.26), regional relapse–free survival was 87.8% and 96.0% (p = 0.21); and distant disease–free survival was 67.1% and 92.6% (p = 0.059). In the cPR-ND group, 71.0% had no pathologic evidence of disease (PPV of 29.0%).

Conclusions

Patients with N3 disease achieving regional cPR and primary cCR who underwent ND seemed to have better outcomes than patients achieving global cCR without ND. Clinical assessment with computed tomography is not adequate for evaluating response to treatment. Because of the inherent limitations of our study, further confirmatory studies are warranted.

 Department of Radiation OncologyCentre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal–Hôpital Notre-Dame, Montreal, QC, Canada

 Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck SurgeryCentre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal–Hôpital Notre-Dame, Montreal, QC, Canada

 Department of Medical OncologyCentre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal–Hôpital Notre-Dame, Montreal, QC, Canada

§ Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal–Hôpital Notre-Dame, Montreal, QC, Canada

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Levon Igidbashian, M.D., Department of Radiation Oncology, CHUM–Hôpital Notre-Dame, 1560 Sherbrooke St. Est, Montreal, QC, Canada H2L 4M1. Tel: (514) 890-8254; Fax: (514) 412-7537

 Presented in part in oral form at the 7th International Conference on Head and Neck Cancer, San Francisco, CA, July 19–23, 2008.

 Conflict of interest: none.

PII: S0360-3016(09)00822-0

doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.05.034