International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 49, Issue 4 , Pages 973-985, 15 March 2001

Estimating the need for radiotherapy for lung cancer: an evidence-based, epidemiologic approach

Preliminary results of this work were presented at the Annual Meetings of the Canadian Association of Radiation Oncologists, in 1998 and 1999.

  • Scott Tyldesley, M.D. (F.R.C.P.C.)

      Affiliations

    • Radiation Oncology Research Unit, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
    • Departments of Oncology, and Community Health and Epidemiology, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
    • Kingston Regional Cancer Centre, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
    • Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
    • Dr. Tyldesley was a Health Policy Research Fellow at the Radiation Oncology Research Unit at Queen’s University. He is now a Staff Radiation Oncologist at the Vancouver Cancer Clinic.
  • ,
  • Chris Boyd (M.Sc.)

      Affiliations

    • Radiation Oncology Research Unit, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
    • Departments of Oncology, and Community Health and Epidemiology, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • Karleen Schulze (M.Math.)

      Affiliations

    • Radiation Oncology Research Unit, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
    • Departments of Oncology, and Community Health and Epidemiology, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • Hugh Walker, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Radiation Oncology Research Unit, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
    • Departments of Oncology, and Community Health and Epidemiology, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • William J Mackillop (M.B., Ch.B., F.R.C.P.C.)

      Affiliations

    • Radiation Oncology Research Unit, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
    • Departments of Oncology, and Community Health and Epidemiology, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
    • Kingston Regional Cancer Centre, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
    • Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Dr. W. J. Mackillop, Kingston General Hospital, Radiation Oncology Research Unit, Apps Level 4, 76 Stuart Street Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L, 2V7

Accepted 22 August 2000.

Abstract 

Background and Objectives: Current estimates of the proportion of cancer patients who will require radiotherapy (RT) are based almost entirely on expert opinion. The objective of this study was to use an evidence-based approach to estimate the proportion of incident cases of lung cancer that will require RT at any point in the evolution of the illness.

Methods: A systematic review of the literature was undertaken to identify indications for RT for lung cancer, and to ascertain the level of evidence that supported each indication. An epidemiologic approach was then used to estimate the incidence of each indication for RT in a typical North American population of lung cancer patients. The effect of sampling error on the estimated appropriate rate of RT was calculated mathematically, and the effect of systematic error, was estimated by sensitivity analysis.

Results: It was shown that 53.6% ± 3.3% of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) cases develop one or more indications for RT at some point in the course of the illness, 45.4% ± 4.3% in their initial treatment, and 8.2% ± 1.5% later for recurrence of progression. Overall, 64.3% ± 4.7% of non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases require RT, 45.9% ± 4.3% in their initial treatment, and 18.3% ± 1.8% later in the course of the illness. The proportion of NSCLC cases that ever require RT is stage dependent; 41.0% ± 5.5% in Stage I; 54.5% ± 6.5% in Stage II; 83.5% ± 10.6% in Stage III; and 65.7% ± 7.6% in Stage IV. In total, 61.0% ± 3.9% of all patients with lung cancer will develop one or more indications for RT at some point in the illness, 44.6% ± 3.6% in their initial treatment, and 16.5% ± 1.5% later for recurrence or progression.

Conclusion: This method provides a rational starting point for the long-term planning of radiation services, and for the audit of access to RT at the population level. We now plan to extend this study to the other major cancer sites to enable us to estimate the appropriate RT treatment rate for the cancer population as a whole.

Keywords:  Radiotherapy, Needs assessment, Lung cancer, Treatment guidelines

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported in part by grants from the National Cancer Institute of Canada, with funding from the Canadian Cancer Society and Cancer Care Ontario (W.J.M.). Fellowship support for S. Tyldesley was provided by the Terry Fox Fellowship Fund of the National Cancer Institute of Canada, and the Shane Fellowship from the Order of the Eastern Star.

PII: S0360-3016(00)01401-2

doi:10.1016/S0360-3016(00)01401-2

International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 49, Issue 4 , Pages 973-985, 15 March 2001