International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 50, Issue 5 , Pages 1113-1122, 1 August 2001

Incorporating biologic measurements (SF2, CFE) into a tumor control probability model increases their prognostic significance: a study in cervical carcinoma treated with radiation therapy

  • Francesca Meteora Buffa, B.Sc.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physics, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Trust, London, England UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Francesca M. Buffa, Institute of Cancer Research, Joint Department of Physics, Cotswold Road, SM2 5NG, Sutton, London, UK. Tel: +44 (0) 207 8082241; Fax: +44 (0) 207 8082522
  • ,
  • Susan E. Davidson, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Oncology, Paterson Institute for Cancer Research, Christie Hospital NHS Trust, Manchester, England UK
  • ,
  • Robert D. Hunter, F.R.C.R.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Oncology, Paterson Institute for Cancer Research, Christie Hospital NHS Trust, Manchester, England UK
  • ,
  • Alan E. Nahum, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physics, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Trust, London, England UK
  • ,
  • Catharine M.L. West, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • CRC Experimental Radiation Oncology Group, Paterson Institute for Cancer Research, Christie Hospital NHS Trust, Manchester, England UK

Accepted 13 March 2001.

Abstract 

To assess whether incorporation of measurements of surviving fraction at 2 Gy (SF2) and colony-forming efficiency (CFE) into a tumor control probability (tcp) model increases their prognostic significance.

Measurements of SF2 and CFE were available from a study on carcinoma of the cervix treated with radiation alone. These measurements, as well as tumor volume, dose, and treatment time, were incorporated into a Poisson tcp model (tcpα,ρ). Regression analysis was performed to assess the prognostic power of tcpα,ρ vs. the use of either tcp models with biologic parameters fixed to best-fit estimates (but incorporating individual dose, volume, and treatment time) or the use of SF2 and CFE measurements alone.

In a univariate regression analysis of 44 patients, tcpα,ρ was a better prognostic factor for both local control and survival (p < 0.001 and p = 0.049, respectively) than SF2 alone (p = 0.009 for local control, p = 0.29 for survival) or CFE alone (p = 0.015 for local control, p = 0.38 for survival). In multivariate analysis, tcpα,ρ emerged as the most important prognostic factor for local control (p < 0.001, relative risk of 2.81). After allowing for tcpα,ρ, CFE was still a significant independent prognostic factor for local control, whereas SF2 was not. The sensitivities of tcpα,ρ and SF2 as predictive tests for local control were 87% and 65%, respectively. Specificities were 70% and 77%, respectively.

A Poisson tcp model incorporating individual SF2, CFE, dose, tumor volume, and treatment time was found to be the best independent prognostic factor for local control and survival in cervical carcinoma patients.

Keywords:  Radiobiologic models, Radiosensitivity, SF2, Predictive assays, Tumor control probability

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The mathematical analyses were supported by the Institute of Cancer Research, UK. The experimental work on which these analyses were carried out was supported by the Cancer Research Campaign, UK.

PII: S0360-3016(01)01584-X

International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 50, Issue 5 , Pages 1113-1122, 1 August 2001