Volume 50, Issue 5 , Pages 1113-1122, 1 August 2001
Incorporating biologic measurements (SF2, CFE) into a tumor control probability model increases their prognostic significance: a study in cervical carcinoma treated with radiation therapy☆
Abstract
To assess whether incorporation of measurements of surviving fraction at 2 Gy (SF2) and colony-forming efficiency (CFE) into a tumor control probability (tcp) model increases their prognostic significance.
Measurements of SF2 and CFE were available from a study on carcinoma of the cervix treated with radiation alone. These measurements, as well as tumor volume, dose, and treatment time, were incorporated into a Poisson tcp model (tcpα,ρ). Regression analysis was performed to assess the prognostic power of tcpα,ρ vs. the use of either tcp models with biologic parameters fixed to best-fit estimates (but incorporating individual dose, volume, and treatment time) or the use of SF2 and CFE measurements alone.
In a univariate regression analysis of 44 patients, tcpα,ρ was a better prognostic factor for both local control and survival (p < 0.001 and p = 0.049, respectively) than SF2 alone (p = 0.009 for local control, p = 0.29 for survival) or CFE alone (p = 0.015 for local control, p = 0.38 for survival). In multivariate analysis, tcpα,ρ emerged as the most important prognostic factor for local control (p < 0.001, relative risk of 2.81). After allowing for tcpα,ρ, CFE was still a significant independent prognostic factor for local control, whereas SF2 was not. The sensitivities of tcpα,ρ and SF2 as predictive tests for local control were 87% and 65%, respectively. Specificities were 70% and 77%, respectively.
A Poisson tcp model incorporating individual SF2, CFE, dose, tumor volume, and treatment time was found to be the best independent prognostic factor for local control and survival in cervical carcinoma patients.
Keywords: Radiobiologic models, Radiosensitivity, SF2, Predictive assays, Tumor control probability
To access this article, please choose from the options below
☆ The mathematical analyses were supported by the Institute of Cancer Research, UK. The experimental work on which these analyses were carried out was supported by the Cancer Research Campaign, UK.
PII: S0360-3016(01)01584-X
© 2001 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 50, Issue 5 , Pages 1113-1122, 1 August 2001
