International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 56, Issue 2 , Pages 348-354, 1 June 2003

Tumor location cannot predict the mobility of lung tumors: a 3D analysis of data generated from multiple CT scans

  • John R van Sörnsen de Koste

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Frank J Lagerwaard, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Margriet R.J Nijssen-Visser

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Wilfried J Graveland, M.Sc.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Statistics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Suresh Senan, M.R.C.P., F.R.C.R., Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Dr. Suresh Senan, Department of Radiation Oncology, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, Postbox 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Tel: +31-20-444-0414; Fax: +31-20-444-0410;

Received 23 September 2002; received in revised form 11 November 2002; accepted 18 November 2002.

Abstract 

Purpose

There is limited information available on the three-dimensional (3D) motion of lung tumors. Data derived from multiple planning computed tomographic (CT) scans were used to characterize the 3D movement of small peripheral lung tumors.

Methods and materials

A total of 29 data sets from patients with Stage I non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), each of which consisted of three “rapid” and three “slow” planning CT scans, were analyzed. All six scans were coregistered, and contoured gross tumor volumes (GTVs) were expanded by 5 mm to derive clinical target volumes (CTVs). Two-dimensional and 3D displacement vectors of the individual CTVs, relative to an “optimal” CTV derived from all six scans, were generated. Tumor mobility was correlated with location. Three-dimensional margins, which had to be added to individual CTVs to ensure coverage of “optimal” CTVs, were determined.

Results

No significant correlation was observed between the anatomic location of tumors and the extent of mobility in the x, y, and z axes. However, supradiaphragmatic lesions exhibited more mobility, particularly in the craniocaudal direction. The addition of a 3D margin of 5 mm to a single slow CTV ensured full coverage of the “optimal CTV”.

Conclusions

Lung tumors demonstrate significant mobility in all directions, and this did not closely correlate with anatomic location. Individualized assessment of tumor mobility remains necessary, and is possible when the CTV derived from a single slow scan is used for radiotherapy planning.

Keywords:  Lung cancer, Stage I, Tumor mobility, CT planning

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0360-3016(02)04467-X

doi:10.1016/S0360-3016(02)04467-X

International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 56, Issue 2 , Pages 348-354, 1 June 2003