International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 61, Issue 1 , Pages 52-59, January 2005

Dosimetry and cancer control after low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy

  • W. Robert Lee, M.S., M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Radiation Oncology, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: W. Robert Lee, M.S., M.D., Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, USA 27157-1030. Tel: (336) 716-4630; Fax: (336) 716-7837
  • ,
  • Allan F. deGuzman, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Radiation Oncology, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
  • ,
  • Kevin P. McMullen, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Radiation Oncology, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
  • ,
  • David L. McCullough, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA

Received 23 February 2004; received in revised form 30 April 2004; accepted 3 May 2004.

Abstract 

Purpose

To describe the relationship between two commonly used dosimetric quantifiers (dose received by 90% of the prostate [D90] and volume receiving 100% of dose [V100]) and biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) in a cohort of men treated with low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (LDRPB).

Methods and materials

The information in this report concerned the first 63 men treated with LDRPB alone at our institution between September 1997 and September 1998. All men had histologically confirmed, clinically localized prostate cancer. All men were treated with125I. The prescription dose was 144 Gy according to the Task Group 43 formalism. LDRPB was performed jointly by a radiation oncologist and urologist. Dosimetric quantifiers (D90, V100) were calculated from a CT scan performed 1 month after LDRPB. Biochemical recurrence was defined according to the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus definition. Biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) was estimated using the product-limit method. D90 and V100 were examined as putative covariates for bRFS using the proportional hazards regression method. All p values are two-sided.

Results

The median follow-up for the entire cohort was 62 months. The median D90 was 122 Gy (range, 57–171Gy), and in 16 (25%) of 63 patients, the calculated D90 was >140 Gy. The median V100 was 81% (range, 51–97%). Nine men developed evidence of biochemical relapse at a median of 19 months (range, 6–38 months). The 5-year estimate of bRFS was 85% (95% confidence interval, 80–90%). The 5-year estimates of bRFS according to D90 were as follows: D90 ≥140 Gy, 86%; D90 <140 Gy, 84% (p = not statistically significant). No threshold value of D90 was predictive of the 5-year estimates of bRFS until the D90 was <80 Gy (D90 ≥80 Gy, 89%; D90 <80 Gy, 50%; p = 0.02). The 5-year estimates of bRFS according to V100 were as follows: V100 ≥85%, 87%; V100 <85%, 84% (p = not statistically significant). No threshold value of V100 was predictive of the 5-year estimates of BRFS unless the dosimetry was particularly poor. The 5-year BRFS was 89% if the V100 was ≥65% compared with 40% if the V100 was <65% (p = 0.006).

Conclusion

The dosimetric quantifiers described in this report did not predict for bRFS after LDRPB unless the dosimetry was very poor. This finding is not in complete agreement with those of previous reports. Possible reasons for this observation are (1) the study in underpowered, (2) inherent measurement error, (3) dosimetric quantifiers are poor surrogates of the dose received by the cancer, and (4) length of follow-up. Additional work in the area of quality assessment after LDRPB is required.

Keywords:  Prostate brachytherapy, 125I, PSA, dosimetry

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0360-3016(04)00781-3

doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.05.006

International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 61, Issue 1 , Pages 52-59, January 2005