International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 61, Issue 1 , Pages 20-31, January 2005

Vessel-sparing prostate radiotherapy: Dose limitation to critical erectile vascular structures (internal pudendal artery and corpus cavernosum) defined by MRI

  • Patrick W. McLaughlin, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Providence Cancer Center, Southfield, MI, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Patrick W. McLaughlin, M.D., University of Michigan Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI 48109. Tel: (248) 849-3321; Fax: (248) 849-8448
  • ,
  • Vrinda Narayana, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Providence Cancer Center, Southfield, MI, USA
  • ,
  • Amichay Meirowitz, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
  • ,
  • Sara Troyer, B.S.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
  • ,
  • Peter L. Roberson, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
  • ,
  • Roger Gonda Jr., M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Providence Hospital, Southfield, MI, USA
  • ,
  • Howard Sandler, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
  • ,
  • Lon Marsh

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
  • ,
  • Theodore Lawrence, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
  • ,
  • Marc Kessler, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

Received 9 October 2003; received in revised form 30 March 2004; accepted 2 April 2004.

Purpose

Most evidence suggests that impotence after prostate radiation therapy has a vascular etiology. The corpus cavernosum (CC) and the internal pudendal artery (IPA) are the critical vascular structures related to erectile function. This study suggests that it is feasible to markedly decrease radiation dose to the CC and the IPA and directly determine the impact of dose limitation on potency.

Methods and materials

Twenty-five patients (10 external beam, 15 brachytherapy) underwent MRI/CT-based treatment planning for prostate cancer. In addition, 10 patients entered on the vessel-sparing protocol underwent a time-of-flight MRI angiography sequence to define the IPA. The distance from the MRI-defined prostate apex to the penile bulb (PB), CC, and IPA was measured and compared to the distance from the CT-defined apex. Doses (D5 and D50) to the PB, CC, and IPA were determined for an 80 Gy external beam course. In 5 patients, CT plans were generated and compared to MRI-based plans.

Results

The combination of coronal, sagittal, and axial MRI data sets allowed superior definition of the prostate apex and its relationship to critical vascular structures. The apex to PB distance averaged 1.45 cm (0.36 standard deviation) with a range of 0.7 cm to 2.1 cm. Peak dose (D5) to the proximal CC in the MRI-planned 80 Gy course was 26 (9) Gy (0.36 of CT-planned dose), and peak dose to the IPA was 39 (13) Gy (0.61 of CT-planned dose).

Conclusion

The distance between the prostate apex and critical vascular structures is highly variable. Current empiric rules for CT contouring (apex 1.5 cm above PB) overestimate or underestimate the distance between the prostate apex and critical vascular structures. When defined by MRI T2 and MRI angiogram with CT registration, limitation of dose to critical erectile structures is possible, with a more significant gain than has been previously reported using dose limitation by commonly applied intensity modulated radiation therapy studies based on CT imaging. These techniques make “vessel-sparing” prostate radiotherapy feasible.

Keywords:  Prostate radiotherapy , Potency preservation , MRI treatment planning

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0360-3016(04)00842-9

doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.04.070

Refers to erratum:

  • Errata

    International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics 1 April 2005 (Vol. 61, Issue 5, Page 1609)

International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 61, Issue 1 , Pages 20-31, January 2005