International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 60, Issue 3 , Pages 1005-1006 , 1 November 2004

In regard to Paulino and Johnstone: Use of PET and CT imaging data in radiation therapy planning. Int J Radit Oncol Biol Phys 2004;59:4–5

References  

  1. Paulino AC , Johnstone PA . FDG-PET in radiotherapy treatment planning: Pandora's box? . Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys . 2004;59:4–5
  2. Bradley J , Thorstad WL , Mutic S , et al.  Impact of FDG-PET on radiation therapy volume delineation in non-small-cell lung cancer . Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys . 2004;59:78–86
  3. Mac Manus MP , Hicks RJ , Ball DL , et al.  F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography staging in radical radiotherapy candidates with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: powerful correlation with survival and high impact on treatment . Cancer . 2001;92:886–895
  4. Caldwell CB , Mah K , Skinner M , Danjoux CE . Can PET provide the 3D extent of tumor motion for individualized internal target volumes? (A phantom study of the limitations of CT and the promise of PET) . Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys . 2003;55:1381–1393
  5. Huang SC . Anatomy of SUV (Standardized uptake value) . Nucl Med Biol . 2000;27:643–646

PII: S0360-3016(04)02001-2

doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.07.667

International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 60, Issue 3 , Pages 1005-1006 , 1 November 2004