International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 61, Issue 1 , Pages 10-13, January 2005

Novel use of zebrafish as a vertebrate model to screen radiation protectors and sensitizers

Presented at AACR 95th annual meeting.

  • Mary Frances McAleer, M.D., Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Adam Paul Dicker, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Bodine Center for Cancer Treatment, 111 South 11th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107. Tel: (215) 955-6527; Fax: (215) 955-0412
  • ,
  • Christian Davidson, B.S.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
  • ,
  • William Robert Davidson, M.S.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
  • ,
  • Brad Yentzer, B.S.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dermatology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
  • ,
  • Steven A. Farber, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
  • ,
  • Ulrich Rodeck, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dermatology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
  • ,
  • Adam P. Dicker, M.D., Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA

Received 21 May 2004; received in revised form 8 September 2004; accepted 10 September 2004.

Purpose

Zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos provide a unique vertebrate model to screen therapeutic agents easily and rapidly because of their relatively close genetic relationship to humans, ready abundance and accessibility, short embryonal development, and optical clarity. To validate zebrafish embryos as a screen for radiation modifiers, we evaluated the effects of ionizing radiation in combination with a known radioprotector (free radical scavenger Amifostine) or radiosensitizing agent (tyrosine kinase inhibitor AG1478).

Methods and materials

Viable zebrafish embryos were exposed to 0–10 Gy single-fraction 250 kVp X-rays with or without either Amifostine (0–4 mM) or AG1478 (0–10 μM) at defined developmental stages from 1–24 h postfertilization (hpf). Embryos were examined for morphologic abnormalities and viability until 144 hpf.

Results

Radiation alone produced a time- and dose-dependent perturbation of normal embryonic development and survival with maximal sensitivity at doses ≥4 Gy delivered before 4 hpf. Amifostine markedly attenuated this effect, whereas AG1478 enhanced teratogenicity and lethality, particularly at therapeutically relevant (2–6 Gy) radiation doses.

Conclusions

Collectively, these data validate the use of zebrafish as a vertebrate model to assess the effect of radiation alone or with radiation response modulators. Zebrafish embryos may thus provide a rapid, facile system to screen novel agents ultimately intended for human use in the context of therapeutic or accidental radiation exposure.

Keywords:  Zebrafish , Ionizing radiation , Radioprotectors , Radiosensitizers , Drug screen

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported by Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Tobacco Settlement Act, R01 CA106633-01, DAMD17-02-1-0216; and NCI/NIH/DHHS R25 CA48010.

PII: S0360-3016(04)02680-X

doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.09.046

International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 61, Issue 1 , Pages 10-13, January 2005