Volume 64, Issue 1 , Pages 47-56, 1 January 2006
Chemotherapy in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: An individual patient data meta-analysis of eight randomized trials and 1753 patients
Objectives: To study the effect of adding chemotherapy to radiotherapy (RT) on overall survival and event-free survival for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Methods and Materials: This meta-analysis used updated individual patient data from randomized trials comparing chemotherapy plus RT with RT alone in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. The log–rank test, stratified by trial, was used for comparisons, and the hazard ratios of death and failure were calculated.
Results: Eight trials with 1753 patients were included. One trial with a 2 × 2 design was counted twice in the analysis. The analysis included 11 comparisons using the data from 1975 patients. The median follow-up was 6 years. The pooled hazard ratio of death was 0.82 (95% confidence interval, 0.71–0.94; p = 0.006), corresponding to an absolute survival benefit of 6% at 5 years from the addition of chemotherapy (from 56% to 62%). The pooled hazard ratio of tumor failure or death was 0.76 (95% confidence interval, 0.67–0.86; p < 0.0001), corresponding to an absolute event-free survival benefit of 10% at 5 years from the addition of chemotherapy (from 42% to 52%). A significant interaction was observed between the timing of chemotherapy and overall survival (p = 0.005), explaining the heterogeneity observed in the treatment effect (p = 0.03), with the highest benefit resulting from concomitant chemotherapy.
Conclusion: Chemotherapy led to a small, but significant, benefit for overall survival and event-free survival. This benefit was essentially observed when chemotherapy was administered concomitantly with RT.
Keywords: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma , Randomized trial , Chemotherapy , Meta-analysis , Individual patient data
To access this article, please choose from the options below
A complete list of the members of the MAC-NPC Collaborative Group is provided in the Appendix.Supported by the Institut Gustave-Roussy, Aventis, Sanofi-Synthelabo, and Schering-Plough who had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report. The authors had full access to all the data and are fully responsible for the decision to submit the paper for publication.
PII: S0360-3016(05)02221-2
doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.06.037
© 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 64, Issue 1 , Pages 47-56, 1 January 2006
