Journal Home
Search for

Volume 66, Issue 5, Pages 1356-1365 (1 December 2006)


View previous. 11 of 60 View next.

Dosimetric predictors of acute hematologic toxicity in cervical cancer patients treated with concurrent cisplatin and intensity-modulated pelvic radiotherapy

Presented at the 47th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO), Denver, Colorado, October 16–20, 2005.

Loren K. Mell, M.D.Corresponding Author Informationemail address, Joel D. Kochanski, M.D., John C. Roeske, Ph.D., Josh J. Haslam, B.S., Neil Mehta, M.D., S. Diane Yamada, M.D., Jean A. Hurteau, M.D.§, Yvonne C. Collins, M.D.§, Ernst Lengyel, M.D., Ph.D., Arno J. Mundt, M.D.

Received 20 December 2005; received in revised form 4 February 2006; accepted 1 March 2006. published online 05 June 2006.

Purpose: To identify dosimetric parameters associated with acute hematologic toxicity (HT) and chemotherapy delivery in cervical cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemotherapy and intensity-modulated pelvic radiotherapy.

Methods and Materials: We analyzed 37 cervical cancer patients receiving concurrent cisplatin (40 mg/m2/wk) and intensity-modulated pelvic radiotherapy. Pelvic bone marrow (BM) was contoured for each patient and divided into three subsites: lumbosacral spine, ilium, and lower pelvis. The volume of each region receiving 10, 20, 30, and ≥40 Gy (V10, V20, V30, and V40, respectively) was calculated. HT was graded according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group system. Multivariate regression models were used to test associations between dosimetric parameters and HT and chemotherapy delivery.

Results: Increased pelvic BM V10 (BM-V10) was associated with an increased Grade 2 or worse leukopenia and neutropenia (odds ratio [OR], 2.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24–3.53; p = 0.006; and OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.02–1.94; p = 0.037, respectively). Patients with BM-V10 ≥90% had higher rates of Grade 2 or worse leukopenia and neutropenia than did patients with BM-V10 <90% (11.1% vs. 73.7%, p < 0.01; and 5.6% vs. 31.6%, p = 0.09) and were more likely to have chemotherapy held on univariate (16.7% vs. 47.4%, p = 0.08) and multivariate (OR, 32.2; 95% CI, 1.67–622; p = 0.02) analysis. No associations between HT and V30 and V40 were observed. Dosimetric parameters involving the lumbosacral spine and lower pelvis had stronger associations with HT than did those involving the ilium.

Conclusion: The volume of pelvic BM receiving low-dose radiation is associated with HT and chemotherapy delivery in cervical cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

 Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL

 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Section of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL

 Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL

§ Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL

 Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Loren K. Mell, M.D., Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago Hospitals, 5758 S. Maryland Ave., MC 9006, Chicago, IL 60637, Tel: (773) 702-6870; Fax: (773) 834-7340.

PII: S0360-3016(06)00408-1

doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.03.018


View previous. 11 of 60 View next.