International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 66, Issue 3 , Pages 680-686, 1 November 2006

Planning the breast tumor bed boost: Changes in the excision cavity volume and surgical scar location after breast-conserving surgery and whole-breast irradiation

Presented in part at the 46th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO), Atlanta, GA, October 3–7, 2004.

  • Kevin S. Oh, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI
  • ,
  • Feng-Ming Kong, M.D., Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI
  • ,
  • Kent A. Griffith, M.P.H., M.S.

      Affiliations

    • Biostatistics Unit of the University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI
  • ,
  • Beth Yanke, C.M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI
  • ,
  • Lori J. Pierce, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Lori J. Pierce, M.D., Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109. Tel: (734) 936-7810; Fax: (734) 763-7370

Received 3 February 2006; received in revised form 11 April 2006; accepted 16 April 2006. published online 24 July 2006.

Purpose: The aims of this study were to determine the changes in breast and excision cavity volumes after whole-breast irradiation and the adequacy of using the surgical scar to guide boost planning.

Methods and Materials: A total of 30 women consecutively treated for 31 breast cancers were included in this study. Simulation CT scans were performed before and after whole-breast irradiation. CT breast volumes were delineated using clinically defined borders. Excision cavity volumes were contoured based on surgical clips, the presence of a hematoma, and/or other surgical changes. Hypothetical electron boost plans were generated using the surgical scar with a 3-cm margin and analyzed for coverage.

Results: The mean CT breast volumes were 774 and 761 cc (p = 0.22), and the excision cavity volumes were 32.1 and 25.1 cc (p < 0.0001), before and after 40 Gy (39–42 Gy) of whole-breast irradiation, respectively. The volume reduction in the excision cavity was inversely correlated with time elapsed since surgery (R = 0.46, p < 0.01) and body weight (R = 0.50, p < 0.01). The scar-guided hypothetical plans failed to cover the excision cavity adequately in 62% and 53.8% of cases using the pretreatment and postradiation CTs, respectively. Per the hypothetical plans, the minimum dose to the excision cavity was significantly lower for tumors located in the inner vs. outer quadrants (p = 0.02) and for cavities >20 cc vs. <20 cc (p = 0.01).

Conclusions: This study demonstrates a significant reduction in the volume of the excision cavity during whole-breast irradiation. Scar-guided boost plans provide inadequate coverage of the excision cavity in the majority of cases.

Keywords:  Breast cancer , Radiotherapy , Excision cavity , Surgical scar , Boost

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Note—An online CME test for this article can be taken at www.astro.org under Education and Meetings.

PII: S0360-3016(06)00692-4

doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.04.042

International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 66, Issue 3 , Pages 680-686, 1 November 2006