International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 66, Issue 3 , Pages 654-662, 1 November 2006

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy improves lymph node coverage and dose to critical structures compared with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy in clinically localized prostate cancer

Presented at the Forty Seventh Annual Meeting of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO), October 16–20, 2005, Denver, CO.

  • Alice Wang-Chesebro, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Alice Wang-Chesebro, M.D., University of California–San Francisco, Department of Radiation Oncology, 1600 Divisadero Street, Suite H1031, San Francisco, CA 94115. Tel: (415) 353-7175; Fax: (415) 353-9883;
  • ,
  • Ping Xia, Ph.D.
  • ,
  • Joy Coleman, M.D.
  • ,
  • Clayton Akazawa, C.M.D.
  • ,
  • Mack Roach III, M.D.

Radiation Oncology, University of California–San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

Received 23 March 2006; received in revised form 8 May 2006; accepted 23 May 2006.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to quantify gains in lymph node coverage and critical structure dose reduction for whole-pelvis (WP) and extended-field (EF) radiotherapy in prostate cancer using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) compared with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) for the first treatment phase of 45 Gy in the concurrent treatment of lymph nodes and prostate.

Methods and Materials: From January to August 2005, 35 patients with localized prostate cancer were treated with pelvic IMRT; 7 had nodes defined up to L5-S1 (Group 1), and 28 had nodes defined above L5-S1 (Group 2). Each patient had 2 plans retrospectively generated: 1 WP 3DCRT plan using bony landmarks, and 1 EF 3DCRT plan to cover the vascular defined volumes. Dose-volume histograms for the lymph nodes, rectum, bladder, small bowel, and penile bulb were compared by group.

Results: For Group 1, WP 3DCRT missed 25% of pelvic nodes with the prescribed dose 45 Gy and missed 18% with the 95% prescribed dose 42.75 Gy, whereas WP IMRT achieved V45 Gy = 98% and V42.75 Gy = 100%. Compared with WP 3DCRT, IMRT reduced bladder V45 Gy by 78%, rectum V45 Gy by 48%, and small bowel V45 Gy by 232 cm3. EF 3DCRT achieved 95% coverage of nodes for all patients at high cost to critical structures. For Group 2, IMRT decreased bladder V45 Gy by 90%, rectum V45 Gy by 54% and small bowel V45 Gy by 455 cm3 compared with EF 3DCRT.

Conclusion: In this study WP 3DCRT missed a significant percentage of pelvic nodes. Although EF 3DCRT achieved 95% pelvic nodal coverage, it increased critical structure doses. IMRT improved pelvic nodal coverage while decreasing dose to bladder, rectum, small bowel, and penile bulb. For patients with extended node involvement, IMRT especially decreases small bowel dose.

Keywords:  Prostate cancer , Pelvic nodal irradiation , Intensity-modulated radiotherapy , Conventional pelvic nodal irradiation , Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0360-3016(06)00953-9

doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.05.037

International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 66, Issue 3 , Pages 654-662, 1 November 2006