International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 66, Issue 5 , Pages 1313-1319, 1 December 2006

Twenty-year incidence and patterns of contralateral breast cancer after breast conservation treatment with radiation

Presented in part at the 47th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Denver, CO, October 16–20, 2005.

  • Christine E. Hill-Kayser, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Christine Hill-Kayser, M.D., Department of Radiation Oncology, 2 Donner Building, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104. Tel: (215) 662-2428; Fax: (215) 349-5445
  • ,
  • Eleanor E.R. Harris, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
  • ,
  • Wei-Ting Hwang, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
  • ,
  • Lawrence J. Solin, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA

Received 16 April 2006; received in revised form 30 June 2006; accepted 2 July 2006. published online 25 September 2006.

Purpose: This study was undertaken to determine the incidence of contralateral breast cancer (CLB) after treatment for early-stage breast cancer with breast-conserving treatment (BCT), and to observe patterns of CLB presentation.

Methods: Medical records of 1,801 women treated for unilateral AJCC Stage 0–II breast cancer with BCT between 1977 and 2000 were analyzed as a retrospective cohort.

Results: The incidence of any CLB at 20 years was 15.4%. The annual risk of developing any CLB remained constant at approximately 0.75% per year after treatment. The median time to any CLB was 8.2 years (range, 0.5–26.5 years). No difference in incidence of CLB was demonstrated in patients with primary invasive carcinoma vs. DCIS (p = 0.84). The majority of patients (83%) developing CLB tumors developed invasive disease. The risk of developing an invasive CLB did not differ significantly for patients with DCIS vs. those with primary invasive carcinoma (p = 0.20). The method of detection of the primary tumor (mammography vs. physical examination) was not predictive of detection of the CLB (p = 0.20). Finally, the location of CLB tumors was not affected by that of prior tumors (p = 0.82).

Conclusions: The risk of development of CLB persists for at least 20 years after treatment for early-stage breast cancer. CLB tumors are frequently invasive, and their location is not influenced by location of prior tumors. Mammography and physical examination remain essential after BCT for detection of a contralateral breast cancer, regardless of the method of detection of the primary tumor.

Keywords: Breast-conservation treatment, Contralateral breast cancer, Ductal carcinoma in situ, DCIS, Radiation treatment

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported in part by a grant from The Breast Cancer Research Foundation.

PII: S0360-3016(06)01185-0

doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.07.009

International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 66, Issue 5 , Pages 1313-1319, 1 December 2006