International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 67, Issue 1 , Pages 164-170, 1 January 2007

Intensity modulated radiation-therapy for preoperative posterior abdominal wall irradiation of retroperitoneal liposarcomas

Presented in part at the Forty-Seventh Annual Meeting of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiation Oncology (ASTRO), October 16–20, 2005, Denver, CO.

  • Alberto Bossi, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Alberto Bossi, M.D., Department of Radiation Therapy, University Hospitals Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. Tel: (+32) 16-346900
  • ,
  • Ivo De Wever, M.D., Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgical Oncology, University Hospitals Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
  • ,
  • Erik Van Limbergen, M.D., Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
  • ,
  • Bianca Vanstraelen

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Physics, University Hospitals Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium

Received 13 June 2006; received in revised form 25 July 2006; accepted 16 August 2006. published online 02 November 2006.

Purpose: Preoperative external-beam radiation therapy (preop RT) in the management of Retroperitoneal Liposarcomas (RPLS) typically involves the delivery of radiation to the entire tumor mass: yet this may not be necessary. The purpose of this study is to evaluate a new strategy of preop RT for RPLS in which the target volume is limited to the contact area between the tumoral mass and the posterior abdominal wall.

Methods and Materials: Between June 2000 and Jan 2005, 18 patients with the diagnosis of RPLS have been treated following a pilot protocol of pre-op RT, 50 Gy in 25 fractions of 2 Gy/day. The Clinical Target Volume (CTV) has been limited to the posterior abdominal wall, region at higher risk for local relapse. A Three-Dimensional conformal (3D-CRT) and an Intensity Modulated (IMRT) plan were generated and compared; toxicity was reported following the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0.

Results: All patients completed the planned treatment and the acute toxicity was tolerable: 2 patients experienced Grade 3 and 1 Grade 2 anorexia while 2 patients developed Grade 2 nausea. IMRT allows a better sparing of the ipsilateral and the contralateral kidney. All tumors were successfully resected without major complications. At a median follow-up of 27 months 2 patients developed a local relapse and 1 lung metastasis.

Conclusions: Our strategy of preop RT is feasible and well tolerated: the rate of resectability is not compromised by limiting the preop CTV to the posterior abdominal wall and a better critical-structures sparing is obtained with IMRT.

Keywords: Sarcoma, Preoperative radiotherapy, Intensity modulated radiotherapy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Conflict of interest: none.

PII: S0360-3016(06)02785-4

doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.08.023

Refers to erratum:

  • Erratum

    International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics 1 May 2007 (Vol. 68, Issue 1, Page 317)

International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 67, Issue 1 , Pages 164-170, 1 January 2007