International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 67, Issue 3 , Pages 823-827, 1 March 2007

X-ray–assisted positioning of patients treated by conformal arc radiotherapy for prostate cancer: Comparison of setup accuracy using implanted markers versus bony structures

  • Guy Soete, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiotherapy, Academic Hospital Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Guy Soete, M.D., Department of Radiotherapy, Oncology Center, Academic Hospital Free University of Brussels (AZ VUB), Laarbeeklaan 101, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium. Tel: (+32) 2-477-6144; Fax: (+32) 2-477-6212
  • ,
  • Mieke De Cock, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiotherapy, Academic Hospital Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
  • ,
  • Dirk Verellen, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiotherapy, Academic Hospital Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
  • ,
  • Dirk Michielsen, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Academic Hospital Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
  • ,
  • Frans Keuppens, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Academic Hospital Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
  • ,
  • Guy Storme, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiotherapy, Academic Hospital Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium

Received 18 April 2006; received in revised form 24 August 2006; accepted 22 September 2006. published online 30 December 2006.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare setup accuracy of NovalisBody stereoscopic X-ray positioning using implanted markers in the prostate vs. bony structures in patients treated with dynamic conformal arc radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Methods and Materials: Random and systematic setup errors (RE and SE) of the isocenter with regard to the center of gravity of three fiducial markers were measured by means of orthogonal verification films in 120 treatment sessions in 12 patients. Positioning was performed using NovalisBody semiautomated marker fusion. The results were compared with a control group of 261 measurements in 15 patients who were positioned with NovalisBody automated bone fusion. In addition, interfraction and intrafraction prostate motion was registered in the patients with implanted markers.

Results: Marker-based X-ray positioning resulted in a reduction of RE as well as SE in the anteroposterior, craniocaudal, and left–right directions compared with those in the control group. The interfraction prostate displacements with regard to the bony pelvis that could be avoided by marker positioning ranged between 1.6 and 2.8 mm for RE and between 1.3 and 4.3 mm for SE. Intrafraction random and systematic prostate movements ranged between 1.4 and 2.4 mm and between 0.8 and 1.3 mm, respectively.

Conclusion: The problem of interfraction prostate motion can be solved by using implanted markers. In addition, the NovalisBody X-ray system performs more accurately with markers compared with bone fusion. Intrafraction organ motion has become the limiting factor for margin reduction around the clinical target volume.

Keywords: Prostate cancer, Implanted markers, Conformal radiotherapy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was supported in part by a grant from BrainLAB A.G., Heimstetten, Germany. NovalisBody is a product of BrainLAB A.G., Heimstetten, Germany.

 Conflict of interest: none.

PII: S0360-3016(06)03227-5

doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.09.041

International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 67, Issue 3 , Pages 823-827, 1 March 2007