Volume 69, Issue 4 , Pages 1238-1245, 15 November 2007
Assessment of Tumor Response to the Vascular Disrupting Agents 5,6-Dimethylxanthenone-4-Acetic Acid or Combretastatin-A4-Phosphate by Intrinsic Susceptibility Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Purpose
To investigate the use of the transverse magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) relaxation rate R2∗ (s-1) as a biomarker of tumor vascular response to monitor vascular disrupting agent (VDA) therapy.
Methods and Materials
Multigradient echo MRI was used to quantify R2∗ in rat GH3 prolactinomas. R2∗ is a sensitive index of deoxyhemoglobin in the blood and can therefore be used to give an index of tissue oxygenation. Tumor R2∗ was measured before and up to 35 min after treatment, and 24 h after treatment with either 350 mg/kg 5,6-dimethylxanthenone-4-acetic acid (DMXAA) or 100 mg/kg combretastatin-A4-phosphate (CA4P). After acquisition of the MRI data, functional tumor blood vessels remaining after VDA treatment were quantified using fluorescence microscopy of the perfusion marker Hoechst 33342.
Results
DMXAA induced a transient, significant (p < 0.05) increase in tumor R2∗ 7 min after treatment, whereas CA4P induced no significant changes in tumor R2∗ over the first 35 min. Twenty-four hours after treatment, some DMXAA-treated tumors demonstrated a decrease in R2∗, but overall, reduction in R2∗ was not significant for this cohort. Tumors treated with CA4P showed a significant (p < 0.05) reduction in R2∗ 24 h after treatment. The degree of Hoechst 33342 uptake was associated with the degree of R2∗ reduction at 24 h for both agents.
Conclusions
The reduction in tumor R2∗ or deoxyhemoglobin levels 24 h after VDA treatment was a result of reduced blood volume caused by prolonged vascular collapse. Our results suggest that DMXAA was less effective than CA4P in this rat tumor model.
To access this article, please choose from the options below
J. R. Griffith's present address is CRUK Cambridge Research Institute, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0RE, United Kingdom.
Supported by Cancer Research UK, Grant CI 6412/A6269 and The Royal Society. S.P.R. is the recipient of a Royal Society University Research Fellowship.
Conflict of interest: none.
PII: S0360-3016(07)03910-7
doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.08.025
© 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 69, Issue 4 , Pages 1238-1245, 15 November 2007
