International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 71, Issue 2 , Pages 377-385, 1 June 2008

Patterns of Failure and Toxicity after Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL

Received 21 August 2007; received in revised form 9 October 2007; accepted 12 October 2007. published online 03 January 2008.

Purpose

To determine the outcome of patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for head and neck cancer.

Methods and Materials

We reviewed the charts of 100 consecutive patients treated with IMRT for squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx (64%), nasopharynx (16%), hypopharynx (14%), and larynx (6%). Most patients were treated with a concomitant boost schedule to 72 Gy. Of the 100 patients, 54 (54%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, mostly concurrent cisplatin. The dosimetry plans for patients with either locoregional failure or Grade 4-5 complications were reviewed and fused over the computed tomography images corresponding with the location of the event. Marginal failures were defined as those that occurred at a region of high-dose falloff, where conventional fields would have provided better coverage.

Results

The median follow-up of living patients was 3.1 years (range, 1–5.2 years). The 3-year rate of local control, locoregional control, freedom from relapse, cause-specific survival, and overall survival for all patients was 89%, 87%, 72%, 78%, and 71%, respectively. The 3-year rate of freedom from relapse, cause-specific survival, and overall survival for the 64 oropharynx patients was 86%, 92%, and 84%, respectively. Of the 10 local failures, 2 occurred at the margin of the high-dose planning target volume. Both regional failures occurred within the planning target volume. No locoregional failures occurred outside the planning target volume. Of the 100 patients, 8 and 5 had Grade 4 and 5 complications from treatment, respectively. All patients with Grade 5 complications had received adjuvant chemotherapy. No attempt was made to discriminate between the complications from IMRT and other aspects of the patients' treatment.

Conclusion

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy did not compromise the outcome compared with what we have achieved with conventional techniques. The 2 cases of recurrence in the high-dose gradient region highlight the potential hazard of approaches that involve highly conformal dose distributions.

Outcomes, Intensity-modulated radiotherapy, Head and neck cancer

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Conflict of interest: none.

PII: S0360-3016(07)04423-9

doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.10.010

International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 71, Issue 2 , Pages 377-385, 1 June 2008