International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 72, Issue 2 , Pages 373-382, 1 October 2008

Dose-Effect Relationships for the Submandibular Salivary Glands and Implications for Their Sparing by Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy

  • Carol-Anne Murdoch-Kinch, D.D.S., Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oral Medicine/Hospital Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
  • ,
  • Hyugnjin M. Kim, Sc.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
  • ,
  • Karen A. Vineberg, B.Sc.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
  • ,
  • Jonathan A. Ship, D.M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oral Medicine/Hospital Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
  • ,
  • Avraham Eisbruch, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Avraham Eisbruch, MD, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Hospital, 1500 E. Med Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0010. Tel: (734) 936-9337. Fax: (734) 763-7370

Received 8 November 2007; received in revised form 16 December 2007; accepted 17 December 2007. published online 11 March 2008.

Purpose

Submandibular salivary glands (SMGs) dysfunction contributes to xerostomia after radiotherapy (RT) of head-and-neck (HN) cancer. We assessed SMG dose–response relationships and their implications for sparing these glands by intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).

Methods and Materials

A total of 148 HN cancer patients underwent unstimulated and stimulated SMG salivary flow rate measurements selectively from Wharton's duct orifices, before RT and periodically through 24 months after RT. Correlations of flow rates and mean SMG doses were modeled throughout all time points. IMRT replanning in 8 patients whose contralateral level I was not a target incorporated the results in a new cost function aiming to spare contralateral SMGs.

Results

Stimulated SMG flow rates decreased exponentially by (1.2%)Gy as mean doses increased up to 39 Gy threshold, and then plateaued near zero. At mean doses ≤39 Gy, but not higher, flow rates recovered over time at 2.2%/month. Similarly, the unstimulated salivary flow rates decreased exponentially by (3%)Gy as mean dose increased and recovered over time if mean dose was <39 Gy. IMRT replanning reduced mean contralateral SMG dose by average 12 Gy, achieving ≤39 Gy in 5 of 8 patients, without target underdosing, increasing the mean doses to the parotid glands and swallowing structures by average 2–3 Gy.

Conclusions

SMG salivary flow rates depended on mean dose with recovery over time up to a threshold of 39 Gy. Substantial SMG dose reduction to below this threshold and without target underdosing is feasible in some patients, at the expense of modestly higher doses to some other organs.

Head-and-neck cancer, Xerostomia, Submandibular salivary glands, Intensity-modulated radiotherapy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Dr. Ship's current address: New York University College of Dentistry, New York, NY.

 Presented at the 49th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO), October 28–November 1, 2007, Los Angeles, CA.

 Supported by NIH K12 Award RR017607, NIH grant PO1-CA59827, and the Duke Family Head and Neck Research Fund.

 Conflict of interest: none.

PII: S0360-3016(07)04773-6

doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.12.033

International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 72, Issue 2 , Pages 373-382, 1 October 2008