International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 72, Issue 4 , Pages 1134-1139, 15 November 2008

Prospective Clinical Trial of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Image-Guided Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Cervical Carcinoma With Positive Para-Aortic Lymph Nodes

  • Jacqueline Esthappan, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Jacqueline Esthappan, Ph.D., Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, 4921 Parkview Place, Campus Box 8224, St. Louis, MO 63110. Tel: (314) 747-9859; Fax: (314) 747-9557
  • ,
  • Summer Chaudhari, M.S.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
  • ,
  • Lakshmi Santanam, Ph.D

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
  • ,
  • Sasa Mutic, M.S.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
  • ,
  • Jeffrey Olsen, B.S.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
  • ,
  • Dusten M. MacDonald, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
  • ,
  • Daniel A. Low, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
  • ,
  • Anurag K. Singh, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
  • ,
  • Perry W. Grigsby, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO

Received 12 September 2007; received in revised form 18 February 2008; accepted 21 February 2008. published online 09 May 2008.

Purpose

To describe a more aggressive treatment technique allowing dose escalation to positive para-aortic lymph nodes (PALN) in patients with cervical cancer, by means of positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT)–guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Here, we describe methods for simulation and planning of these treatments and provide objectives for target coverage as well as normal tissue sparing to guide treatment plan evaluation.

Methods and Materials

Patients underwent simulation on a PET/CT scanner. Treatment plans were generated to deliver 60.0 Gy to the PET-positive PALN and 50.0 Gy to the PALN and pelvic lymph node beds. Treatment plans were optimized to deliver at least 95% of the prescribed doses to at least 95% of each target volume. Dose–volume histograms were calculated for normal structures.

Results

The plans of 10 patients were reviewed. Target coverage goals were satisfied in all plans. Analysis of dose–volume histograms indicated that treatment plans involved irradiation of approximately 50% of the bowel volume to at least 25.0 Gy, with less than 10% receiving at least 50.0 Gy and less than 1% receiving at least 60.0. With regard to kidney sparing, approximately 50% of the kidney volume received at least 16.0 Gy, less than 5% received at least 50.0 Gy, and less than 1% received at least 60.0 Gy.

Conclusions

We have provided treatment simulation and planning methods as well as guidelines for the evaluation of target coverage and normal tissue sparing that should facilitate the more aggressive treatment of cervical cancer.

IMRT, Cervix cancer, PET/CT, Dose escalation, Treatment planning

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Conflict of interest: none.

PII: S0360-3016(08)00413-6

doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.02.063

International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 72, Issue 4 , Pages 1134-1139, 15 November 2008