International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 72, Issue 1 , Pages 127-133, 1 September 2008

Internet-Based Survey Evaluating Use of Pain Medications and Attitudes of Radiation Oncology Patients Toward Pain Intervention

  • Charles B. Simone II, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
    • Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Charles B. Simone, II, M.D., National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Radiation Oncology Branch, Bldg. 10-CRC, Rm. B2-3500, 10 Center Dr., Bethesda, MD 20892. Tel: (301) 496-5457; Fax: (301) 480-5439
  • ,
  • Neha Vapiwala, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
  • ,
  • Margaret K. Hampshire, R.N.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
  • ,
  • James M. Metz, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA

Received 14 February 2008; received in revised form 14 March 2008; accepted 27 March 2008. published online 10 June 2008.

Purpose

Pain is a common symptom among cancer patients, yet many patients do not receive adequate pain management. Few data exist quantifying analgesic use by radiation oncology patients. This study evaluated the causes of pain in cancer patients and investigated the reasons patients fail to receive optimal analgesic therapy.

Methods and Materials

An institutional review board-approved, Internet-based questionnaire assessing analgesic use and pain control was posted on the OncoLink (available at www.oncolink.org) Website. Between November 2005 and April 2006, 243 patients responded. They were predominantly women (73%), white (71%), and educated beyond high school (67%) and had breast (38%), lung (6%), or ovarian (6%) cancer. This analysis evaluated the 106 patients (44%) who underwent radiotherapy.

Results

Of the 106 patients, 58% reported pain from their cancer treatment, and 46% reported pain directly from their cancer. The pain was chronic in 51% and intermittent in 33%. Most (80%) did not use medication to manage their pain. Analgesic use was significantly less in patients with greater education levels (11% vs. 36%, p = 0.002), with a trend toward lower use by whites (16% vs. 32%, p = 0.082) and women (17% vs. 29%, p = 0.178). The reasons for not taking analgesics included healthcare provider not recommending medication (87%), fear of addiction or dependence (79%), and inability to pay (79%). Participants experiencing pain, but not taking analgesics, pursued alternative therapies for relief.

Conclusions

Many radiation oncology patients experience pain from their disease and cancer treatment. Most study participants did not use analgesics because of concerns of addiction, cost, or failure of the radiation oncologist to recommend medication. Healthcare providers should have open discussions with their patients regarding pain symptoms and treatment.

Quality of life, Pain management, Internet, Analgesic, Pain

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Conflict of interest: none.

PII: S0360-3016(08)00749-9

doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.03.071

International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 72, Issue 1 , Pages 127-133, 1 September 2008