Volume 73, Issue 3 , Pages 679-684, 1 March 2009
An Eight-Year Experience of HDR Brachytherapy Boost for Localized Prostate Cancer: Biopsy and PSA Outcome
Purpose
To evaluate the biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS), the 2-year biopsy outcome and the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) bounce in patients with localized prostate cancer treated with an inversely planned high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy boost.
Materials and methods
Data were collected from 153 patients treated between 1999 and 2006 with external beam pelvic radiation followed by an HDR Ir-192 prostate boost. These patients were given a boost of 18 to 20 Gy using inverse-planning with simulated annealing (IPSA).We reviewed and analyzed all prostate-specific antigen levels and control biopsies.
Results
The median follow-up was 44 months (18–95 months). When categorized by risk of progression, 74.5% of patients presented an intermediate risk and 14.4% a high one. Prostate biopsies at 2 years posttreatment were negative in 86 of 94 patients (91.5%), whereas two biopsies were inconclusive. Biochemical control at 60 months was at 96% according to the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology and the Phoenix consensus definitions. A PSA bounce (PSA values of 2 ng/mL or more above nadir) was observed in 15 patients of 123 (9.8%). The median time to bounce was 15.2 months (interquartile range, 11.0–17.7) and the median bounce duration 18.7 months (interquartile range, 12.1–29). The estimate of overall survival at 60 months was 97.1% (95% CI, 91.6–103%).
Conclusions
Considering that inverse planned HDR brachytherapy prostate boosts led to an excellent biochemical response, with a 2-year negative biopsy rate, we recommend a conservative approach in face of a PSA bounce even though it was observed in 10% of patients.
Prostate, Brachytherapy, High-dose rate, Inverse planning, Prostate biopsy
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Presented at the 2007 annual ABS meeting in Boston, MA, and the 2007 annual GEC-ESTRO meeting in Montpellier, France.
Supported by the National Cancer Institute of Canada and the Canadian Cancer Society.
Conflict of interest: none.
PII: S0360-3016(08)00782-7
doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.05.003
© 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 73, Issue 3 , Pages 679-684, 1 March 2009
