International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 72, Issue 1 , Pages 236-246, 1 September 2008

Intrafractional Motion of the Prostate During Hypofractionated Radiotherapy

  • Yaoqin Xie, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
  • ,
  • David Djajaputra, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
  • ,
  • Christopher R. King, Ph.D., M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
  • ,
  • Sabbir Hossain, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
  • ,
  • Lijun Ma, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
  • ,
  • Lei Xing, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Lei Xing, Ph.D., Stanford University School of Medicine Department of Radiation Oncology, 875 Blake Wilbur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305-5847. Tel: (650) 498-7896; Fax: (650) 498-4015

Received 7 December 2007; received in revised form 10 April 2008; accepted 29 April 2008.

Purpose

To report the characteristics of prostate motion as tracked by the stereoscopic X-ray images of the implanted fiducials during hypofractionated radiotherapy with CyberKnife.

Methods and Materials

Twenty-one patients with prostate cancer who were treated with CyberKnife between January 2005 and September 2007 were selected for this retrospective study. The CyberKnife uses a stereoscopic X-ray system to obtain the position of the prostate target through the monitoring of implanted gold fiducial markers. If there is a significant deviation, the treatment is paused while the patient is repositioned by moving the couch. The deviations calculated from X-ray images acquired within the time interval between two consecutive couch motions constitute a data set.

Results

Included in the analysis were 427 data sets and 4,439 time stamps of X-ray images. The mean duration for each data set was 697 sec. At 30 sec, a motion >2 mm exists in about 5% of data sets. The percentage is increased to 8%, 11%, and 14% at 60 sec, 90 sec, and 120 sec, respectively. A similar trend exists for other values of prostate motion.

Conclusions

With proper monitoring and intervention during treatment, the prostate shifts observed among patients can be kept within the tracking range of the CyberKnife. On average, a sampling rate of ∼40 sec between consecutive X-rays is acceptable to ensure submillimeter tracking. However, there is significant movement variation among patients, and a higher sampling rate may be necessary in some patients.

CyberKnife, Prostate cancer, Fiducial markers, Real-time tracking

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Conflict of interest: none.

PII: S0360-3016(08)00808-0

doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.04.051

International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 72, Issue 1 , Pages 236-246, 1 September 2008