Journal Home
Search for

Volume 72, Issue 1, Pages 220-227 (1 September 2008)


View previous. 35 of 62 View next.

Feasibility of a Multigroup Deterministic Solution Method for Three-Dimensional Radiotherapy Dose Calculations

Oleg N. Vassiliev, Ph.D., Todd A. Wareing, Ph.D., Ian M. Davis, M.S., John McGhee, Ph.D., Douglas Barnett, Ph.D., John L. Horton, Ph.D., Kent Gifford, Ph.D., Gregory Failla, M.S., Uwe Titt, Ph.D., Firas Mourtada, Ph.D.Corresponding Author Informationemail address

Received 1 December 2007; received in revised form 18 April 2008; accepted 24 April 2008.

Purpose

To investigate the potential of a novel deterministic solver, Attila, for external photon beam radiotherapy dose calculations.

Methods and Materials

Two hypothetical cases for prostate and head-and-neck cancer photon beam treatment plans were calculated using Attila and EGSnrc Monte Carlo simulations. Open beams were modeled as isotropic photon point sources collimated to specified field sizes. The sources had a realistic energy spectrum calculated by Monte Carlo for a Varian Clinac 2100 operated in a 6-MV photon mode. The Attila computational grids consisted of 106,000 elements, or 424,000 spatial degrees of freedom, for the prostate case, and 123,000 tetrahedral elements, or 492,000 spatial degrees of freedom, for the head-and-neck cases.

Results

For both cases, results demonstrate excellent agreement between Attila and EGSnrc in all areas, including the build-up regions, near heterogeneities, and at the beam penumbra. Dose agreement for 99% of the voxels was within the 3% (relative point-wise difference) or 3-mm distance-to-agreement criterion. Localized differences between the Attila and EGSnrc results were observed at bone and soft-tissue interfaces and are attributable to the effect of voxel material homogenization in calculating dose-to-medium in EGSnrc. For both cases, Attila calculation times were <20 central processing unit minutes on a single 2.2-GHz AMD Opteron processor.

Conclusions

The methods in Attila have the potential to be the basis for an efficient dose engine for patient-specific treatment planning, providing accuracy similar to that obtained by Monte Carlo.

 Department of Radiation Physics, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

 Transpire, Inc., Gig Harbor, WA

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Firas Mourtada, Ph.D., Department of Radiation Physics, Box 1210, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1220 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030. Tel: (713) 563-2608; Fax: (713) 563-6895

 Funded by National Institutes of Health Small Business Innovation Research Phase I Award no. R43 CA105806-01A1.

 Conflict of interest: Some authors who contributed to this work are employed by Transpire, Inc.

PII: S0360-3016(08)00814-6

doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.04.057


View previous. 35 of 62 View next.