Volume 73, Issue 4 , Pages 1033-1042, 15 March 2009
Prognostic Value of Survivin in Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer: Study Based on RTOG 8610
Purpose
To examine the prognostic value of nuclear and cytoplasmic survivin expression in men with locally advanced prostate cancer who were enrolled in Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) protocol 8610.
Methods and Materials
RTOG 8610 was a Phase III randomized study comparing the effect of radiotherapy plus short-term androgen deprivation with radiotherapy alone. Of the 456 eligible patients, 68 patients had suitably stained tumor material for nuclear survivin analysis and 65 patients for cytoplasmic survivin.
Results
Compared with patients with nuclear survivin intensity scores of ≤191.2, those with intensity scores >191.2 had significantly improved prostate cancer survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20–1.00, p = 0.0452). On multivariate analysis, nuclear survivin intensity scores >191.2 were significantly associated with improved overall survival (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.25–0.86; p = 0.0156) and prostate cancer survival (HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.16–0.84; p = 0.0173). On univariate analysis, compared with patients with cytoplasmic survivin integrated optical density ≤82.7, those with an integrated optical density >82.7 showed a significantly increased risk of local progression (HR, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.03–6.01; p = 0.0421).
Conclusion
Nuclear overexpression of survivin was associated with improved overall and prostate cancer survival on multivariate analysis, and cytoplasmic overexpression of survivin was associated with increased rate of local progression on univariate analysis in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer treated on RTOG 8610. Our results might reflect the different functions of survivin and its splice variants, which are known to exist in distinct subcellular compartments.
Survivin, Prostate cancer, Radiotherapy, Prognostic factor
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Supported by Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Grant U10CA21661, Community Clinical Oncology Program Grant U10CA37422, and Grants Stat U10CA32115 from the National Cancer Institute to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and the Pennsylvania Department of Health and R01 CA101984-01 (both to A. Pollack).
Conflict of interest: none.
PII: S0360-3016(08)02473-5
doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.06.1489
© 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 73, Issue 4 , Pages 1033-1042, 15 March 2009
