Journal Home
Search for

Volume 74, Issue 2, Pages 383-387 (1 June 2009)


View previous. 10 of 55 View next.

RTOG GU Radiation Oncology Specialists Reach Consensus on Pelvic Lymph Node Volumes for High-Risk Prostate Cancer

Colleen A.F. Lawton, M.D.Corresponding Author Informationemail address, Jeff Michalski, M.D., Issam El-Naqa, Ph.D., Mark K. Buyyounouski, M.D.§, W. Robert Lee, M.D., Cynthia Menard, M.D., Elizabeth O'Meara, M.D.∗∗, Seth A. Rosenthal, M.D.††, Mark Ritter, M.D.‡‡, Michael Seider, M.D.§§

Received 18 June 2008; received in revised form 30 July 2008; accepted 2 August 2008. published online 22 October 2008.

Purpose

Radiation therapy to the pelvic lymph nodes in high-risk prostate cancer is required on several Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) clinical trials. Based on a prior lymph node contouring project, we have shown significant disagreement in the definition of pelvic lymph node volumes among genitourinary radiation oncology specialists involved in developing and executing current RTOG trials.

Materials and Methods

A consensus meeting was held on October 3, 2007, to reach agreement on pelvic lymph node volumes. Data were presented to address the lymph node drainage of the prostate. Extensive discussion ensued to develop clinical target volume (CTV) pelvic lymph node consensus.

Results

Consensus was obtained resulting in computed tomography image-based pelvic lymph node CTVs. Based on this consensus, the pelvic lymph node volumes to be irradiated include: distal common iliac, presacral lymph nodes (S1-S3), external iliac lymph nodes, internal iliac lymph nodes, and obturator lymph nodes. Lymph node CTVs include the vessels (artery and vein) and a 7-mm radial margin being careful to “carve out” bowel, bladder, bone, and muscle. Volumes begin at the L5/S1 interspace and end at the superior aspect of the pubic bone. Consensus on dose–volume histogram constraints for OARs was also attained.

Conclusions

Consensus on pelvic lymph node CTVs for radiation therapy to address high-risk prostate cancer was attained and is available as web-based computed tomography images as well as a descriptive format through the RTOG. This will allow for uniformity in evaluating the benefit and risk of such treatment.

 Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee WI

 Washington University, St. Louis, MO

 Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, St. Louis, MO

§ Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA

 Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC

 PMH-UHN University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

∗∗ American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, PA

†† Radiation Oncology Center, Radiological Associates of Sacramento, Sacramento, CA

‡‡ University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI

§§ Akron City Hospital, Akron, OH

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Colleen A. F. Lawton, M.D., Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Road, Milwaukee WI 53226. Tel: (414) 805-4472; Fax: (414) 805-4369

 Supported by grants from the National Cancer Institute, CA21661, CA32115, and CA37422.

 Conflict of interest: none

PII: S0360-3016(08)03266-5

doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.08.002


View previous. 10 of 55 View next.