Volume 74, Issue 3 , Pages 714-722, 1 July 2009
Target Definition by C11-Methionine-PET for the Radiotherapy of Brain Metastases
Purpose
To evaluate the ability of 11C-methionine positron emission tomography (MET-PET) to delineate target volumes for brain metastases and to investigate to what extent tumor growth is presented by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MET-PET.
Materials and Methods
Three observers undertook target definition in 19 patients with 95 brain metastases by MRI and MET-PET images. MRI gross target volume (GTV) (GTV-MRI) was defined as the contrast-enhanced area on gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MRI. MET-PET GTV (GTV-PET) was defined as the area of an accumulation of MET-PET apparently higher than that of normal tissue on MET-PET images. The size of occupation ratio was determined using the following equation: SOR (%) of MET are within × mm margin outside GTV-MRI = the volume of the GTV-PET within × mm outside the GTV-MRI/the volume of the GTV-PET.
Results
For GTV-MRI volumes of ≤0.5 mL, the sensitivity of tumor detection by MET-PET was 43%. For GTV-MRI volume of >0.5 mL, GTV-PET volumes were larger than GTV-MRI volumes and a significant correlation was found between these variables by linear regression. For all tumor sizes and tumor characteristics, a 2-mm margin outside the GTV-MRI significantly improved the coverage of the GTV-PET.
Conclusions
Although there were some limitations in our study associated with spatial resolution, blurring effect, and image registrations with PET images, MET-PET was supposed to have a potential as a promising tool for the precise delineation of target volumes in radiotherapy planning for brain metastases.
Methionine-PET, Brain metastases, Radiotherapy, Target definition, MRI
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Parts of this article were presented at 49th Annual Meeting of American Society for Therapeutic Radiation Oncology (ASTRO), October 28–November 1, 2007, Los Angeles, CA.
Conflicts of interest: none
PII: S0360-3016(08)03506-2
doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.08.056
© 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 74, Issue 3 , Pages 714-722, 1 July 2009
