International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 74, Issue 5 , Pages 1506-1512, 1 August 2009

Baseline Utilization of Breast Radiotherapy Before Institution of the Medicare Practice Quality Reporting Initiative

  • Benjamin D. Smith, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Radiation Oncology Flight, Wilford Hall Medical Center, Lackland Air Force Base, Texas
    • Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to: Benjamin D. Smith, M.D., 2200 Bergquist Drive, Suite 1, Lackland AFB, TX 78236. Tel: (210) 292-7771; Fax: (210) 292-3773
  • ,
  • Grace L. Smith, M.D., Ph.D., M.P.H.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
  • ,
  • Kenneth B. Roberts, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
  • ,
  • Thomas A. Buchholz, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas

Received 7 August 2008; received in revised form 11 October 2008; accepted 14 October 2008. published online 22 April 2009.

Purpose

In 2007, Medicare implemented the Physician Quality Reporting Initiative (PQRI), which provides financial incentives to physicians who report their performance on certain quality measures. PQRI measure #74 recommends radiotherapy for patients treated with conservative surgery (CS) for invasive breast cancer. As a first step in evaluating the potential impact of this measure, we assessed baseline use of radiotherapy among women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer before implementation of PQRI.

Methods and Materials

Using the SEER-Medicare data set, we identified women aged 66–70 diagnosed with invasive breast cancer and treated with CS between 2000 and 2002. Treatment with radiotherapy was determined using SEER and claims data. Multivariate logistic regression tested whether receipt of radiotherapy varied significantly across clinical, pathologic, and treatment covariates.

Results

Of 3,674 patients, 94% (3,445) received radiotherapy. In adjusted analysis, the presence of comorbid illness (odds ratio [OR] 1.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19–2.42) and unmarried marital status were associated with omission of radiotherapy (OR 1.65; 95% CI, 1.22–2.20). In contrast, receipt of chemotherapy was protective against omission of radiotherapy (OR 0.25; 95% CI, 0.16–0.38). Race and geographic region did not correlate with radiotherapy utilization.

Conclusions

Utilization of radiotherapy following CS was high for patients treated before institution of PQRI, suggesting that at most 6% of patients could benefit from measure #74. Further research is needed to determine whether institution of PQRI will affect radiotherapy utilization.

Breast neoplasms, Breast conserving therapy, Radiotherapy, Quality of care, Pay-for-performance

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was presented at the 2008 ASCO/ASTRO/SSO Breast Cancer Symposium, Washington, DC, on September 6, 2008.

 Dr. Benjamin Smith was supported by the American Society of Clinical Oncology Young Investigator Award and the Breast Cancer Research Foundation. This study used the linked SEER-Medicare database. The interpretation and reporting of these data are the sole responsibility of the authors. The authors acknowledge the efforts of the Applied Research Program, NCI; the Office of Research, Development and Information, CMS; Information Management Services (IMS); and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program tumor registries in the creation of the SEER-Medicare database.

 Conflict of interest: none.

PII: S0360-3016(08)03592-X

doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.10.012

International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 74, Issue 5 , Pages 1506-1512, 1 August 2009