Volume 74, Issue 5 , Pages 1563-1566, 1 August 2009
Would Larger Radiation Fields Lead to a Faster Onset of Pain Relief in the Palliation of Bone Metastases?
Purpose
Hemibody irradiation has been shown to relieve bony metastatic pain within 24–48 hours of treatment, whereas for local external beam radiation, onset of pain relief is 1–4 weeks after radiation. The primary objective of this study is to examine whether there is a relationship between the areas of radiation treatment and onset of pain relief.
Methods and Materials
From Jan 1999 to Jan 2002, a total of 653 patients with symptomatic bone metastases were treated with external beam radiation. Pain scores and analgesic consumption were recorded at baseline and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12. The areas of radiation treatment for all patients were calculated, then correlated with the response and analyzed in various ways. We first compared pain score alone with mean radiation field size. Second, we combined pain score and analgesic consumption. Last, we implemented the International Consensus end points for pain score and analgesic intake.
Results
Assessment of 653 patients showed no significant correlation comparing pain scores alone with radiation field area, with the exception of Week 4 for partial responders. Again, no significant correlation was found when combining both analgesic intake and pain score against radiation field size. Even when implementing the International Consensus end point definitions for radiation response, the only significant correlation between radiation field size and response was observed in Week 2 for partial response.
Conclusion
There was no statistical significance between mean areas of radiation treatment with the onset of pain relief.
Bone metastases, Palliative radiotherapy, Pain relief, Onset, Area
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Supported by the Michael and Karyn Goldstein Cancer Research Fund and Odette Cancer Centre Radiation Oncology Program Fund.
Conflict of interest: none.
PII: S0360-3016(08)03666-3
doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.10.028
© 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 74, Issue 5 , Pages 1563-1566, 1 August 2009
