International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 74, Issue 3 , Pages 689-694, 1 July 2009

Breast Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Reduces Time Spent With Acute Dermatitis for Women of All Breast Sizes During Radiation

  • Gary M. Freedman, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Gary M. Freedman, M.D., Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111. Tel: (215) 728-3016; Fax: (215) 214-1629
  • ,
  • Tianyu Li, M.S.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biostatistics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
  • ,
  • Nicos Nicolaou, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
  • ,
  • Yan Chen, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
  • ,
  • Charlie C.-M. Ma, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
  • ,
  • Penny R. Anderson, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA

Received 6 July 2008; received in revised form 19 August 2008; accepted 21 August 2008. published online 13 April 2009.

Purpose

To study the time spent with radiation-induced dermatitis during a course of radiation therapy for breast cancer in women treated with conventional or intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).

Methods and Materials

The study population consisted of 804 consecutive women with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiation from 2001 to 2006. All patients were treated with whole-breast radiation followed by a boost to the tumor bed. Whole-breast radiation consisted of conventional wedged photon tangents (n = 405) earlier in the study period and mostly of photon IMRT (n = 399) in later years. All patients had acute dermatitis graded each week of treatment.

Results

The breakdown of the cases of maximum acute dermatitis by grade was as follows: 3%, Grade 0; 34%, Grade 1; 61%, Grade 2; and 2%, Grade 3. The breakdown of cases of maximum toxicity by technique was as follows: 48%, Grade 0/1, and 52%, Grade 2/3, for IMRT; and 25%, Grade 0/1, and 75%, Grade 2/3, for conventional radiation therapy (p < 0.0001). The IMRT patients spent 82% of weeks during treatment with Grade 0/1 dermatitis and 18% with Grade 2/3 dermatitis, compared with 29% and 71% of patients, respectively, treated with conventional radiation (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, the time spent with Grade 2/3 toxicity was decreased in IMRT patients with small (p = 0.0015), medium (p < 0.0001), and large (p < 0.0001) breasts.

Conclusions

Breast IMRT is associated with a significant decrease both in the time spent during treatment with Grade 2/3 dermatitis and in the maximum severity of dermatitis compared with that associated with conventional radiation, regardless of breast size.

Breast cancer, Radiation therapy, IMRT

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Abstract presented at the scientific session of the 49th annual meeting of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology in Los Angeles, CA October 28-Novermber 1, 2007.

 Conflict of Interest: none.

PII: S0360-3016(08)03685-7

doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.08.071

International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 74, Issue 3 , Pages 689-694, 1 July 2009