International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 73, Issue 4 , Pages 1276-1281, 15 March 2009

Impact of Intrafractional Bowel Gas Movement on Carbon Ion Beam Dose Distribution in Pancreatic Radiotherapy

  • Motoki Kumagai, M.S.

      Affiliations

    • Research Center for Charged Particle Therapy, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, Japan
    • School of Health Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
  • ,
  • Ryusuke Hara, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Hospital, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, Japan
  • ,
  • Shinichiro Mori, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Research Center for Charged Particle Therapy, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, Japan
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Shinichiro Mori, Ph.D., M.P.H., Research Center for Charged Particle Therapy, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Chiba, Japan. Tel: (+81) 43-251-2111; Fax: (+81) 43-284-0198
  • ,
  • Takeshi Yanagi, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Hospital, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, Japan
  • ,
  • Hiroshi Asakura, M.S.

      Affiliations

    • Accelerator Engineering Corporation, Chiba, Japan
  • ,
  • Riwa Kishimoto, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Hospital, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, Japan
  • ,
  • Hirotoshi Kato, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Hospital, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, Japan
  • ,
  • Shigeru Yamada, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Hospital, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, Japan
  • ,
  • Susumu Kandatsu, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Hospital, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, Japan
  • ,
  • Tadashi Kamada, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Hospital, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, Japan

Received 13 August 2008; received in revised form 30 October 2008; accepted 30 October 2008.

Purpose

To assess carbon ion beam dose variation due to bowel gas movement in pancreatic radiotherapy.

Methods and Materials

Ten pancreatic cancer inpatients were subject to diagnostic contrast-enhanced dynamic helical CT examination under breath-holding conditions, which included multiple-phase dynamic CT with arterial, venous, and delayed phases. The arterial–venous phase and arterial–delayed phase intervals were 35 and 145 s, respectively. A compensating bolus was designed to cover the target obtained at the arterial phase. Carbon ion dose distribution was calculated by applying the bolus to the CT data sets at the other two phases.

Results

Dose conformation to the clinical target volume was degraded by beam overshoot/undershoot due to bowel gas movement. The D95 for clinical target volume was degraded from 98.2% (range, 98.0–99.1%) of the prescribed dose to 94.7% (range, 88.0–99.0%) at 145 s. Excessive dosing to normal tissues varied among tissues and was, for example, 12.2 GyE/13.1 GyE (0 s/145 s) for the cord and 38.8 GyE/39.8 GyE (0 s/145 s) for the duodenum. The magnitude of beam overshoot/undershoot was particularly exacerbated from the anterior and left directions.

Conclusions

Bowel gas movement causes dosimetric variation to the target during treatment for radiotherapy. The effect of bowel gas movement varies with beam angle, with greatest influence on the anterior–posterior and left–right beams.

Computed tomography, Intrafractional motion, Pancreatic cancer, Bowel gas, Carbon beam, Radiotherapy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Conflict of interest: none.

PII: S0360-3016(08)03725-5

doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.10.055

International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 73, Issue 4 , Pages 1276-1281, 15 March 2009