International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 73, Issue 4 , Pages 1228-1234, 15 March 2009

Using Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography to Assess Tumor Volume During Radiotherapy for Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Its Potential Impact on Adaptive Dose Escalation and Normal Tissue Sparing

  • Mary Feng, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
  • ,
  • Feng-Ming Kong, M.D., Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Feng-Ming Kong, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, UH B2C490 SPC 0500, Ann Arbor, MI 48109. Tel: (734) 769-7426; Fax: (734) 763-7370
  • ,
  • Milton Gross, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
  • ,
  • Shaneli Fernando, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
  • ,
  • James A. Hayman, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
  • ,
  • Randall K. Ten Haken, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

Received 10 August 2008; received in revised form 28 October 2008; accepted 30 October 2008.

Purpose

To quantify changes in fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid tumor volume on positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) during the course of radiation therapy and examine its potential use in adaptive radiotherapy for tumor dose escalation or normal tissue sparing in patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods and Materials

As part of a pilot study, patients with Stage I–III NSCLC underwent FDG-PET/CT before radiotherapy (RT) and in mid-RT (after 40–50 Gy). Gross tumor volumes were contoured on CT and PET scans obtained before and during RT. Three-dimensional conformal RT plans were generated for each patient, first using only pretreatment CT scans. Mid-RT PET volumes were then used to design boost fields.

Results

Fourteen patients with FDG-avid tumors were assessed. Two patients had a complete metabolic response, and 2 patients had slightly increased FDG uptake in the adjacent lung tissue. Mid-RT PET scans were useful in the 10 remaining patients. Mean decreases in CT and PET tumor volumes were 26% (range, +15% to −75%) and 44% (range, +10% to −100%), respectively. Designing boosts based on mid-RT PET allowed for a meaningful dose escalation of 30–102 Gy (mean, 58 Gy) or a reduction in normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of 0.4–3% (mean, 2%) in 5 of 6 patients with smaller yet residual tumor volumes.

Conclusions

Tumor metabolic activity and volume can change significantly after 40–50 Gy of RT. Using mid-RT PET volumes, tumor dose can be significantly escalated or NTCP reduced. Clinical studies evaluating patient outcome after PET-based adaptive RT are ongoing.

Lung cancer, Dose escalation, PET, Adaptive therapy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported in part by a seed grant from the Radiological Society of North America and a 2004 Young Investigator Award from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (F.M.K.).

 This study was presented at the 2005 Radiological Society of North America Annual Meeting and won the Resident in Training Award from the American Association of Women Radiologists (M.F.), November 26–December 1, 2006, Chicago, IL.

 Conflict of interest: none.

PII: S0360-3016(08)03726-7

doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.10.054

International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 73, Issue 4 , Pages 1228-1234, 15 March 2009