Volume 75, Issue 3 , Pages 656-663, 1 November 2009
Hypofractionated Boost With High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy and Open Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Guided Implants for Locally Aggressive Prostate Cancer: A Sequential Dose-Escalation Pilot Study
Purpose
To evaluate the feasibility, tolerance, and preliminary outcome of an open MRI-guided prostate partial-volume high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) schedule in a group of selected patients with nonmetastatic, locally aggressive prostatic tumors.
Methods and Materials
After conventional fractionated three-dimensional conformal external radiotherapy to 64–64.4 Gy, 77 patients with nonmetastatic, locally aggressive (e.g., perineural invasion and/or Gleason score 8–10) prostate cancer were treated from June 2000 to August 2004, with HDR-BT using temporary open MRI-guided 192Ir implants, to escalate the dose in the boost region. Nineteen, 21, and 37 patients were sequentially treated with 2 fractions of 6 Gy, 7 Gy, and 8 Gy each, respectively. Neoadjuvant androgen deprivation was given to 62 patients for 6–24 months. Acute and late toxicity were scored according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer scoring system.
Results
All 77 patients completed treatment as planned. Only 2 patients presented with Grade ≥3 acute urinary toxicity. The 3-year probability of Grade ≥2 late urinary and low gastrointestinal toxicity–free survival was 91.4% ± 3.4% and 94.4% ± 2.7%, respectively. Rates of 3-year biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) and disease-specific survival were 87.1% ± 4.1% and 100%, respectively.
Conclusions
Boosting a partial volume of the prostate with hypofractionated HDR-BT for aggressive prostate cancer was feasible and showed limited long-term toxicity, which compared favorably with other dose-escalation methods in the literature. Preliminary bDFS was encouraging if one considers the negatively selected population of high-risk patients in this study.
Prostate cancer, Brachytherapy, Radiotherapy, High dose rate, Radiation toxicity
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Presented in part at the 46th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, October 3–7, 2004, Atlanta, GA.
Conflict of interest: none.
PII: S0360-3016(08)03793-0
doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.11.023
© 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 75, Issue 3 , Pages 656-663, 1 November 2009
