International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 75, Issue 1 , Pages 16-22, 1 September 2009

Radiation Dose Predicts for Biochemical Control in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients Treated With Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy

  • Alice Y. Ho, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
  • ,
  • Ryan J. Burri, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY
  • ,
  • Jamie A. Cesaretti, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY
  • ,
  • Nelson N. Stone, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY
  • ,
  • Richard G. Stock, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Richard G. Stock, M.D., Department of Radiation Oncology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, Box 1236, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029. Tel: (212) 241-7500; Fax: (212) 410-7194

Received 7 May 2008; received in revised form 12 October 2008; accepted 31 October 2008. published online 16 March 2009.

Purpose

To evaluate the influence of patient- and treatment-related factors on freedom from biochemical failure (FFbF) in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

Methods and Materials

From a prospectively collected database of 2250 men treated at Mount Sinai Hospital from 1990 to 2004 with low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer, 558 men with either one or more intermediate-risk features (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level 10–20 ng/mL, Gleason score 7, or Stage T2b) were identified who had a minimum follow-up of 24 months and postimplant CT-based dosimetric analysis. Biologically effective dose (BED) values were calculated to compare doses from different isotopes and treatment regimens. Patients were treated with brachytherapy with or without hormone therapy and/or external-beam radiotherapy. Patient- and treatment-related factors were analyzed with respect to FFbF. The median follow-up was 60 months (range, 24–167 months). Biochemical failure was defined according to the Phoenix definition. Univariate analyses were used to determine whether any variable was predictive of FFbF. A two-sided p value of <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Overall, the actuarial FFbF at 10 years was 86%. Dose (BED <150 Gy2 vs. ≥150 Gy2) was the only significant predictor of FFbF (p < 0.001). None of the other variables (PSA, external-beam radiotherapy, Gleason score, treatment type, hormones, stage, and number of risk factors) was found to be a statistically significant predictor of 10-year FFbF.

Conclusions

Radiation dose is an important predictor of FFbF in intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Treatment should continue to be individualized according to presenting disease characteristics until results from Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trial 0232 become available.

Prostate cancer, Brachytherapy, Intermediate risk

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Conflict of interest: none.

PII: S0360-3016(08)03870-4

doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.10.071

International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 75, Issue 1 , Pages 16-22, 1 September 2009