International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 75, Issue 4 , Pages 1013-1020, 15 November 2009

Hypofractionated Intensity-Modulated Arc Therapy for Lymph Node Metastasized Prostate Cancer

  • Valérie Fonteyne, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiotherapy, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Valérie Fonteyne, M.D., Department of Radiotherapy, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, Ghent 9000 Belgium. Tel: (+32) 9-332-5972; Fax: (+32) 9-332-3040
  • ,
  • Werner De Gersem, Ir., Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiotherapy, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
  • ,
  • Wilfried De Neve, M.D., Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiotherapy, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
  • ,
  • Filip Jacobs, Ir., Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiotherapy, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
  • ,
  • Nicolaas Lumen, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
  • ,
  • Katrien Vandecasteele, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiotherapy, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
  • ,
  • Geert Villeirs, M.D., Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
  • ,
  • Gert De Meerleer, M.D., Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiotherapy, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium

Received 10 September 2008; received in revised form 18 December 2008; accepted 19 December 2008. published online 21 April 2009.

Purpose

To determine the planning results and acute toxicity after hypofractionated intensity-modulated arc radiotherapy and androgen deprivation for lymph node metastasized (Stage N1) prostate cancer.

Methods and Materials

A total of 31 patients with Stage T1-T4N1M0 prostate cancer were treated with intensity-modulated arc radiotherapy and 3 years of androgen deprivation as primary treatment. The clinical target volume (CTVp) was the prostate and seminal vesicles. Elective lymph node areas (e) were delineated and expanded by 2 mm to create the CTVe. The planning target volumes (PTVp and PTVe) were created using a three-dimensional expansion of the CTVp and CTVe, respectively, of 7 mm. A median dose of 69.3 Gy and 50 Gy was prescribed to the PTVp and PTVe respectively, to be delivered in 25 fractions. Upper and lower gastrointestinal toxicity was scored using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group toxicity and radiotherapy-induced lower intestinal toxicity scoring system. Genitourinary toxicity was scored using a combined Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, LENT-SOMA (late effects normal tissue-subjective, objective, management, analytic), and Common Toxicity Criteria toxicity scoring system.

Results

The median follow-up time was 3 months. The mean prescription dose to the CTVp and PTVp was 70.4 Gy and 68.6 Gy, respectively. The minimal dose to the CTVe and PTVe was 49.0 Gy and 47.0 Gy, respectively. No acute Grade 2 or greater gastrointestinal toxicity occurred. Fourteen patients developed acute Grade 2 lower gastrointestinal toxicity. Acute Grade 3 and 2 genitourinary toxicity developed in 2 and 14 patients, respectively.

Conclusion

The results of our study have shown that hypofractionated intensity-modulated arc radiotherapy as primary therapy for N1 prostate cancer is feasible with low toxicity.

N1 prostate cancer, Intensity-modulated arc therapy, IMAT, Hypofractionation, Acute toxicity

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Sponsored by a scientific grant from the “Foundation Against Cancer.”

 Conflict of interest: none.

PII: S0360-3016(09)00015-7

doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.12.047

International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 75, Issue 4 , Pages 1013-1020, 15 November 2009