International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 76, Issue 2 , Pages 337-341, 1 February 2010

Survival Following Radiation and Androgen Suppression Therapy for Prostate Cancer in Healthy Older Men: Implications for Screening Recommendations

  • Paul L. Nguyen, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Boston, MA
    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Paul L. Nguyen, MD, Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115. Tel: (616) 732-6310; Fax: (617) 732-7347
  • ,
  • Ming-Hui Chen, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Statistics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT
  • ,
  • Andrew A. Renshaw, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pathology, Baptist Hospital of Miami, Miami, FL
  • ,
  • Marian Loffredo, R.N., O.C.N.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
  • ,
  • Philip W. Kantoff, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
  • ,
  • Anthony V. D'Amico, M.D., Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA

Received 16 December 2008; received in revised form 29 January 2009; accepted 29 January 2009. published online 22 April 2009.

Purpose

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force has recommended against screening men over 75 for prostate cancer. We examined whether older healthy men could benefit from aggressive prostate cancer treatment.

Methods and Materials

206 men with intermediate to high risk localized prostate cancer randomized to 70 Gy of radiation (RT) or RT plus 6 months of androgen suppression therapy (RT+AST) constituted the study cohort. Within subgroups stratified by Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27 comorbidity score and age, Cox multivariable analysis was used to determine whether treatment with RT+AST as compared with RT was associated with a decreased risk of death.

Results

Among healthy men (i.e., with mild or no comorbidity), 78 were older than the median age of 72.4 years, and in this subgroup, RT+AST was associated with a significantly lower risk of death on multivariable analysis (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.36 (95% CI=0.13-0.98), p = 0.046, with significantly lower 8-year mortality estimates of 16.5% vs. 41.4% (p = 0.011). Conversely, among men with moderate or severe comorbidity, 24 were older than the median age of 73, and in this subgroup, treatment with RT+AST was associated with a higher risk of death (adjusted hazard ratio = 5.2 (1.3-20.2), p = 0.018).

Conclusion

In older men with mild or no comorbidity, treatment with RT+AST was associated with improved survival compared with treatment with RT alone, suggesting that healthy older men may derive the same benefits from prostate cancer treatment as younger men. We therefore suggest that prostate cancer screening recommendations should not be based on strict age cutoffs alone but should also take into account comorbidity.

Prostate cancer, Elderly, Comorbidity, Androgen suppression therapy, Radiation, Screening

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Conflict of interest: none.

PII: S0360-3016(09)00186-2

doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.01.045

International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 76, Issue 2 , Pages 337-341, 1 February 2010