International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 76, Issue 2 , Pages 349-354, 1 February 2010

Natural History of Clinically Staged Low- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Treated With Monotherapeutic Permanent Interstitial Brachytherapy

  • Al V. Taira, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
  • ,
  • Gregory S. Merrick, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Schiffler Cancer Center and Wheeling Jesuit University, Wheeling, WV
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Gregory S. Merrick, M.D., Schiffler Cancer Center, Wheeling Hospital, 1 Medical Park, Wheeling, WV 26003. Tel: (304) 243-3490; Fax: (304) 243-5047
  • ,
  • Robert W. Galbreath, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Schiffler Cancer Center and Wheeling Jesuit University, Wheeling, WV
  • ,
  • Kent E. Wallner, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Puget Sound Healthcare Corporation, Group Health Cooperative, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
  • ,
  • Wayne M. Butler, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Schiffler Cancer Center and Wheeling Jesuit University, Wheeling, WV

Received 21 November 2008; received in revised form 6 February 2009; accepted 9 February 2009. published online 20 May 2009.

Purpose

To evaluate the natural history of clinically staged low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with permanent interstitial seed implants as monotherapy.

Methods and Materials

Between April 1995 and May 2005, 463 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer underwent brachytherapy as the sole definitive treatment. Men who received supplemental external beam radiotherapy or androgen deprivation therapy were excluded. Dosimetric implant quality was determined based on the minimum dose that covered 90% of the target volume and the volume of the prostate gland receiving 100% of the prescribed dose. Multiple parameters were evaluated as predictors of treatment outcomes.

Results

The 12-year biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS), cause-specific survival, and overall survival rates for the entire cohort were 97.1%, 99.7%, and 75.4%, respectively. Only pretreatment prostate-specific antigen level, percent positive biopsy cores, and minimum dose that covered 90% of the target volume were significant predictors of biochemical recurrence. The bPFS, cause-specific survival, and overall survival rates were 97.4%, 99.6%, and 76.2%, respectively, for low-risk patients and 96.4%, 100%, and 74.0%, respectively, for intermediate-risk patients. The bPFS rate was 98.8% for low-risk patients with high-quality implants versus 92.1% for those with less adequate implants (p < 0.01), and it was 98.3% for intermediate-risk patients with high-quality implants versus 86.4% for those with less adequate implants (p < 0.01).

Conclusions

High-quality brachytherapy implants as monotherapy can provide excellent outcomes for men with clinically staged low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. For these men, a high-quality implant can achieve results comparable to high-quality surgery in the most favorable pathologically staged patient subgroups.

Prostate cancer, Brachytherapy, Cause-specific survival, Biochemical progression-free survival

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Conflict of interest: none.

PII: S0360-3016(09)00258-2

doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.02.021

International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 76, Issue 2 , Pages 349-354, 1 February 2010