International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 76, Issue 2 , Pages 369-378, 1 February 2010

Radiographic and Anatomic Basis for Prostate Contouring Errors and Methods to Improve Prostate Contouring Accuracy

Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology Oncology, September 21–24, 2008, Boston, MA.

  • Patrick W. McLaughlin, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Providence Cancer Center, Novi, MI
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Patrick W. McLaughlin, M.D., Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Assarian Cancer Center, 47601 Grand River, Novi, MI 48374-1236. Tel: (248) 465-4300; Fax: (248) 465-5435
  • ,
  • Cheryl Evans, M.S.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
  • ,
  • Mary Feng, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
  • ,
  • Vrinda Narayana, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Providence Cancer Center, Novi, MI

Received 6 November 2008; received in revised form 26 January 2009; accepted 7 February 2009. published online 09 June 2009.

Purpose

Use of highly conformal radiation for prostate cancer can lead to both overtreatment of surrounding normal tissues and undertreatment of the prostate itself. In this retrospective study we analyzed the radiographic and anatomic basis of common errors in computed tomography (CT) contouring and suggest methods to correct them.

Methods and Materials

Three hundred patients with prostate cancer underwent CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The prostate was delineated independently on the data sets. CT and MRI contours were compared by use of deformable registration. Errors in target delineation were analyzed and methods to avoid such errors detailed.

Results

Contouring errors were identified at the prostatic apex, mid gland, and base on CT. At the apex, the genitourinary diaphragm, rectum, and anterior fascia contribute to overestimation. At the mid prostate, the anterior and lateral fasciae contribute to overestimation. At the base, the bladder and anterior fascia contribute to anterior overestimation. Transition zone hypertrophy and bladder neck variability contribute to errors of overestimation and underestimation at the superior base, whereas variable prostate–to–seminal vesicle relationships with prostate hypertrophy contribute to contouring errors at the posterior base.

Conclusions

Most CT contouring errors can be detected by (1) inspection of a lateral view of prostate contours to detect projection from the expected globular form and (2) recognition of anatomic structures (genitourinary diaphragm) on the CT scans that are clearly visible on MRI. This study shows that many CT prostate contouring errors can be improved without direct incorporation of MRI data.

Prostate contour, GU diaphragm recognition

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Conflict of interest: none.

PII: S0360-3016(09)00260-0

doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.02.019

International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 76, Issue 2 , Pages 369-378, 1 February 2010