International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 76, Issue 1 , Pages 43-49, January 2010

Brachytherapy or Conformal External Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: A Single-Institution Matched-Pair Analysis

Presented orally at the Canadian Association of Radiation Oncology Annual Meeting, Montreal, September 2008.

  • Tom Pickles, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Tom Pickles, M.D., Radiation Oncology Program, BC Cancer Agency, 600 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada. Tel: +1-604-877-6000 x2665; Fax: +1-604-708-2101
  • ,
  • Mira Keyes, M.D.
  • ,
  • W. James Morris, M.D.
  • ,
  • Prostate Outcomes and Provincial Prostate Brachytherapy Program

Prostate Outcomes and Provincial Prostate Brachytherapy Program, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada

Received 18 September 2008; received in revised form 27 January 2009; accepted 27 January 2009. published online 30 June 2009.

Purpose

In the absence of randomized study data, institutional case series have shown brachytherapy (BT) to produce excellent biochemical control (bNED) in patients with localized prostate cancer compared with alternative curative treatments. This study was designed to overcome some of the limitations of case series studies by using a matched-pair design in patients treated contemporaneously with BT and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) at a single institution.

Methods and Materials

Six hundred one eligible patients treated between 1998 and 2001 were prospectively followed up in our institutional databases and matched on a 1:1 basis for the following known prognostic variables: prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, Gleason score, T stage, the use and duration of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy, and the percentage of positive tissue core samples. Two hundred seventy-eight perfect matches of patients (139 in each group) with low- and intermediate-risk cancer were further analyzed. bNED (Phoenix definition) was the primary endpoint. Other endpoints were toxicity, PSA kinetics, and the secondary use of androgen deprivation therapy.

Results

The 5-year bNED rates were 95% (BT) and 85% (EBRT) (p < 0.001). After 7 years, the BT bNED result was unchanged, but the rate in EBRT patients had fallen to 75%. The median posttreatment PSA nadirs were 0.04 ng/mL (BT) and 0.62 ng/mL (EBRT, p < 0.001), which predicted a higher ongoing treatment failure rate in association with EBRT use than with BT use. Late urinary toxicity and rectal/bowel toxicity were worse in patients treated with BT and EBRT, respectively.

Conclusions

BT for both low-risk and selected intermediate-risk cancers achieves exceptional cure rates. Even with dose escalation, it will be difficult for EBRT to match the proven track record of BT seen over the past decade.

Prostate cancer, Brachytherapy, Conformal radiation, Outcomes, Toxicity

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The Prostate Cohort outcomes Initiative is partly funded by an unrestricted educational grant from Abbott Labs Ltd. The Prostate Brachytherapy database receives peer-reviewed funding from the Canadian Association of Radiation Oncology (CARO) through the annual Abbott-CARO Uro-Radiation Oncology Award (ACURA).

 Conflict of interest: Dr. Pickles has received honoraria from Oncura Pty, Australia. No other authors have a conflict of interest.

PII: S0360-3016(09)00421-0

doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.01.081

International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 76, Issue 1 , Pages 43-49, January 2010