International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 76, Issue 5 , Pages 1305-1313, April 2010

Impact of High-Dose Chemotherapy on the Ability to Deliver Subsequent Local–Regional Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer: Analysis of Cancer and Leukemia Group B Protocol 9082

  • Lawrence B. Marks, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, NC
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Lawrence B. Marks, M.D., Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, CB #7512, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7512. Tel: (919) 966-0400; Fax: (919) 966-7681
  • ,
  • Constance Cirrincione, M.S.

      Affiliations

    • Cancer and Leukemia Group B Statistical Center, Duke University, Durham, NC
  • ,
  • Thomas J. Fitzgerald, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, MA
    • Quality Assurance Review Center, Providence, RI
  • ,
  • Frances Laurie

      Affiliations

    • Quality Assurance Review Center, Providence, RI
  • ,
  • Arvin S. Glicksman, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Quality Assurance Review Center, Providence, RI
    • Rhode Island Cancer Council, Pawtucket, RI
  • ,
  • James Vredenburgh, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Oncology, Duke University, Durham, NC
  • ,
  • Leonard R. Prosnitz, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, NC
  • ,
  • Elizabeth J. Shpall, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Adult Bone Marrow Transplant Program, University of Colorado, Denver, CO
  • ,
  • Michael Crump, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
  • ,
  • Paul G. Richardson, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
  • ,
  • Michael W. Schuster, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • North Shore–Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Manhasset, NY
  • ,
  • Jinli Ma, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, NC
    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China
  • ,
  • Bercedis L. Peterson, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Cancer and Leukemia Group B Statistical Center, Duke University, Durham, NC
  • ,
  • Larry Norton, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Solid Tumor Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
  • ,
  • Steven Seagren, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California at San Diego, San Diego, CA
  • ,
  • I. Craig Henderson, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • University of California at San Francisco (UCSF) Cancer Center, UCSF, San Francisco, CA
  • ,
  • David D. Hurd, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Hematology and Oncology, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC
  • ,
  • William P. Peters, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI
  • ,
  • Cancer and Leukemia Group B, Southwest Oncology Group, and National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group

Received 21 August 2008; received in revised form 3 March 2009; accepted 4 April 2009. published online 10 September 2009.

Purpose

To report, from Cancer and Leukemia Group B Protocol 9082, the impact of high-dose cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, and BCNU (HD-CPB) vs. intermediate-dose CPB (ID-CPB) on the ability to start and complete the planned course of local–regional radiotherapy (RT) for women with breast cancer involving ≥10 axillary nodes.

Methods and Materials

From 1991 to 1998, 785 patients were randomized. The HD-CPB and ID-CPB arms were balanced regarding patient characteristics. The HD-CPB and ID-CPB arms were compared on the probability of RT initiation, interruption, modification, or incompleteness. The impact of clinical variables and interactions between variables were also assessed.

Results

Radiotherapy was initiated in 82% (325 of 394) of HD-CPB vs. 92% (360 of 391) of ID-CPB patients (p = 0.001). On multivariate analyses, RT was less likely given to patients who were randomized to HD treatment (odds ratio [OR] = 0 .38, p < 0.001), older (p = 0.005), African American (p = 0.003), postmastectomy (p = 0.02), or estrogen receptor positive (p = 0.03). High-dose treatment had a higher rate of RT interruption (21% vs. 12%, p = 0.001, OR = 2.05), modification (29% vs. 14%, p = 0.001, OR = 2.46), and early termination of RT (9% vs. 2%, p = 0.0001, OR = 5.35), compared with ID.

Conclusion

Treatment arm significantly related to initiation, interruption, modification, and early termination of RT. Patients randomized to HD-CPB were less likely to initiate RT, and of those who did, they were more likely to have RT interrupted, modified, and terminated earlier than those randomized to ID-CPB. The observed lower incidence of RT usage in African Americans vs. non–African Americans warrants further study.

Breast cancer, Radiotherapy, High-dose chemotherapy, Toxicity

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported by National Cancer Institute (NCI) Grants CA31946 (to Cancer and Leukemia Group B [CALBG], Richard L. Schilsky, Chairman), CA33601 (to the CALGB Statistical Center, Stephen George, Director), CA29511 (to the Quality Assurance Review Center), CA47577 (to J.V. and L.R.P.), CA42777 (to E.J.S.), CA77202 (to M.C.), CA32291 (to P.G.R.), CA35279 (to M.W.S.), CA77651 (to L.N.), CA11789 (to S.S.), CA60138 (to I.C.H.), CA03927 (to D.D.H.), and CA14028 (to W.P.P.). This manuscript is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NCI.

 Conflict of interest: L.B.M. receives honoraria from Varian Medical Systems, and grants from the National Institutes of Health, the Lance Armstrong Foundation, and the U.S. Department of Defense. P.G.R. receives an honorarium from Millennium Pharmaceuticals.

PII: S0360-3016(09)00575-6

doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.04.013

International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 76, Issue 5 , Pages 1305-1313, April 2010