Journal Home
Search for

Volume 75, Issue 1, Pages 212-219 (1 September 2009)


View previous. 37 of 61 View next.

Radiosensitizing Effects of Temozolomide Observed in vivo only in a Subset of O6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase Methylated Glioblastoma Multiforme Xenografts

Brett L. Carlson, B.S., Patrick T. Grogan, B.S., Ann C. Mladek, B.S., Mark A. Schroeder, Gaspar J. Kitange, M.D., Ph.D., Paul A. Decker, M.S., Caterina Giannini, M.D., Wenting Wu, Ph.D., Karla A. Ballman, Ph.D., C. David James, Ph.D.§, Jann N. Sarkaria, M.D.Corresponding Author Informationemail address

Received 16 March 2009; received in revised form 20 April 2009; accepted 22 April 2009.

Purpose

Concurrent temozolomide (TMZ) and radiation therapy (RT) followed by adjuvant TMZ is standard treatment for patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), although the relative contribution of concurrent versus adjuvant TMZ is unknown. In this study, the efficacy of TMZ/RT was tested with a panel of 20 primary GBM xenografts.

Methods and Materials

Mice with intracranial xenografts were treated with TMZ, RT, TMZ/RT, or placebo. Survival ratio for a given treatment/line was defined as the ratio of median survival for treatment vs. placebo.

Results

The median survival ratio was significantly higher for O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) methylated tumors versus unmethylated tumors following treatment with TMZ (median survival ratio, 3.6 vs. 1.5, respectively; p = 0.008) or TMZ/RT (5.7 vs. 2.3, respectively; p = 0.001) but not RT alone (1.7 vs. 1.6; p = 0.47). In an analysis of variance, MGMT methylation status and p53 mutation status were significantly associated with treatment response. When we analyzed the additional survival benefit conferred specifically by combined therapy, only a subset (5 of 11) of MGMT methylated tumors derived substantial additional benefit from combined therapy, while none of the MGMT unmethylated tumors did. Consistent with a true radiosensitizing effect of TMZ, sequential treatment in which RT (week 1) was followed by TMZ (week 2) proved significantly less effective than TMZ followed by RT or concurrent TMZ/RT (survival ratios of 4.0, 9.6 and 12.9, respectively; p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Concurrent treatment with TMZ and RT provides significant survival benefit only in a subset of MGMT methylated tumors and provides superior antitumor activity relative to sequential administration of RT and TMZ.

 Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota

 Department of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota

 Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota

§ Department of Neurological Surgery and Brain Tumor Research Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Jann Sarkaria, M.D., Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905. Tel.: (507) 266-3877; Fax: (507) 284-0079

 This work was supported by the Mayo Foundation, the National Cancer Institute (CA108961 and CA127716), and the Brain Tumor Funders Consortium.

 Conflict of interest: none.

PII: S0360-3016(09)00603-8

doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.04.026


View previous. 37 of 61 View next.