Volume 77, Issue 1 , Pages 24-30, 1 May 2010
18F-FDG PET-CT Simulation for Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Effect in Patients Already Staged by PET-CT
Purpose
Positron emission tomography (PET), in addition to computed tomography (CT), has an effect in target volume definition for radical radiotherapy (RT) for non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In previously PET-CT staged patients with NSCLC, we assessed the effect of using an additional planning PET-CT scan for gross tumor volume (GTV) definition.
Methods and Materials
A total of 28 patients with Stage IA-IIIB NSCLC were enrolled. All patients had undergone staging PET-CT to ensure suitability for radical RT. Of the 28 patients, 14 received induction chemotherapy. In place of a RT planning CT scan, patients underwent scanning on a PET-CT scanner. In a virtual planning study, four oncologists independently delineated the GTV on the CT scan alone and then on the PET-CT scan. Intraobserver and interobserver variability were assessed using the concordance index (CI), and the results were compared using the Wilcoxon signed ranks test.
Results
PET-CT improved the CI between observers when defining the GTV using the PET-CT images compared with using CT alone for matched cases (median CI, 0.57 for CT and 0.64 for PET-CT, p = .032). The median of the mean percentage of volume change from GTVCT to GTVFUSED was −5.21% for the induction chemotherapy group and 18.88% for the RT-alone group. Using the Mann-Whitney U test, this was significantly different (p = .001).
Conclusion
PET-CT RT planning scan, in addition to a staging PET-CT scan, reduces interobserver variability in GTV definition for NSCLC. The GTV size with PET-CT compared with CT in the RT-alone group increased and was reduced in the induction chemotherapy group.
Positron emission tomography, computed tomography, PET-CT, radiotherapy planning, lung cancer, non–small-cell lung cancer, NSCLC, target volume definition
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Supported by the Research and Development Office, Northern Ireland Health and Social Services.
Conflict of interest: none.
PII: S0360-3016(09)00621-X
doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.04.045
© 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 77, Issue 1 , Pages 24-30, 1 May 2010
