Volume 78, Issue 1 , Pages 50-57, 1 September 2010
Hypofractionated Boost to the Dominant Tumor Region With Intensity Modulated Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: A Sequential Dose Escalation Pilot Study
Purpose
To evaluate the feasibility, tolerability, and preliminary outcomes in patients with prostate cancer treated according to a hypofractionated dose escalation protocol to boost the dominant tumor-bearing region of the prostate.
Methods and Materials
After conventional fractionated external radiotherapy to 64 to 64.4Gy, 50 patients with nonmetastatic prostate cancer were treated with an intensity-modulated radiotherapy hypofractionated boost under stereotactic conditions to a reduced prostate volume to the dominant tumor region. A rectal balloon inflated with 60cc of air was used for internal organ immobilization. Five, 8, and 8 patients were sequentially treated with two fractions of 5, 6, or 7Gy, respectively (normalized total dose in 2Gy/fraction [NTD2Gy] < 100Gy, low-dose group), whereas 29 patients received two fractions of 8Gy each (NTD2Gy > 100Gy, high-dose group). Androgen deprivation was given to 33 patients. Acute and late toxicities were assessed according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (RTOG/EORTC) scoring system.
Results
Two patients presented with Grade 3 acute urinary toxicity. The 5-year probabilities of ≥Grade 2 late urinary and late low gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity–free survival were 82.2% ± 7.4% and 72.2% ± 7.6%, respectively. The incidence and severity of acute or late toxicities were not correlated with low- vs. high-dose groups, pelvic irradiation, age, or treatment with or without androgen deprivation. The 5-year biochemical disease–free survival (b-DFS) and disease-specific survival were 98% ± 1.9% and 100%, respectively.
Conclusion
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy hypofractionated boost dose escalation under stereotactic conditions was feasible, and showed excellent outcomes with acceptable long-term toxicity. This approach may well be considered an alternative to high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
Prostate cancer, Intensity-modulated radiotherapy, Extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy, Radiation toxicity
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Conflict of interest: none.
PII: S0360-3016(09)02767-9
doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.1689
© 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 78, Issue 1 , Pages 50-57, 1 September 2010
