International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 78, Issue 1 , Pages 19-25 , 1 September 2010

Urinary Obstruction in Prostate Cancer Patients From the Dutch Trial (68 Gy vs. 78 Gy): Relationships With Local Dose, Acute Effects, and Baseline Characteristics

  • Wilma D. Heemsbergen, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Wilma D. Heemsbergen, Ph.D., Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam 1066 CX The Netherlands. Tel: (+31) 20-512-2144; Fax: (+31) 20-669-1101
  • ,
  • Abrahim Al-Mamgani, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center–Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Marnix G. Witte, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Marcel van Herk, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Floris J. Pos, M.D., Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Joos V. Lebesque, M.D., Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Received 27 April 2009 ,Revised 3 July 2009 ,Accepted 19 July 2009.

  • Image Result

    (a, b) Coronal and sagittal views of computed tomography scan in prostate/bladder region for template patient (blue, bladder; black, prostate; dark red, rectum). Cross indicates trigone point 2 cm abo

    (a, b) Coronal and sagittal views of computed tomography scan in prostate/bladder region for template patient (blue, bladder; black, prostate; dark red, rectum). Cross indicates trigone point 2 cm above starting point of prostatic urethra in coronal slice with urethra visible. Asterisk in Fig. b indicates region in which largest dose differences were found (see Fig. 1e, f). (c, d) Average planned dose for all patients in corresponding coronal and sagittal views. Apart from delineated organs, contours of standard deviations included to indicate roughly area of largest dose variations (green, 10-Gy contour; orange, 15 Gy; yellow, 20 Gy). (e, f) Dose difference maps (coronal and sagittal views). Mean dose map of patients without urinary obstruction subtracted from mean dose map of patients with obstruction. White region indicates significant (p < .02) dose differences (range 4–12 Gy). Asterisk in Fig. f indicates region with largest dose differences.

  • Image Result
    Kaplan-Meier curve showing greater incidence (p = .001) of late urinary obstruction for patients with previous transurethral resection of prostate compared with those without previous transurethral re

    Kaplan-Meier curve showing greater incidence (p = .001) of late urinary obstruction for patients with previous transurethral resection of prostate compared with those without previous transurethral resection of prostate.

  • Image Result
    Absolute dose–surface histograms for patients with and without urinary obstruction.

    Absolute dose–surface histograms for patients with and without urinary obstruction.

  • Image Result
    Kaplan-Meier estimates for obstruction. (a) Cumulative incidence for subgroups receiving dose greater than and less than mean dose to trigone point. (b) Cumulative incidence for patients with and with

    Kaplan-Meier estimates for obstruction. (a) Cumulative incidence for subgroups receiving dose greater than and less than mean dose to trigone point. (b) Cumulative incidence for patients with and without hotspots (surface <0.5 or >0.5 cm2 received >80 Gy) for subgroup receiving radiation dose >76 Gy (total n = 256, n = 39 with surface >0.5 cm2).

 Supported by the Dutch Cancer Society (NKB Grants NKI 98-1830, NKI 2007-3895, and CKTO 96-10).

 Conflict of interest: none.

PII: S0360-3016(09)02785-0

doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.1680

International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 78, Issue 1 , Pages 19-25 , 1 September 2010