International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 78, Issue 1 , Pages 72-78, 1 September 2010

Prognostic Factors After Extraneural Metastasis of Medulloblastoma

Presented in part at the 45th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Orlando, FL, May 29 – June 2, 2009.

  • Ali Mazloom, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Section of Radiation Oncology, The Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
  • ,
  • Azy H. Zangeneh, M.P.H.

      Affiliations

    • Division of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, The University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, Texas
  • ,
  • Arnold C. Paulino, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Section of Radiation Oncology, The Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
    • Department of Radiation Oncology, The Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Arnold C. Paulino, M.D., The Methodist Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, 6565 Fannin St., DB1-077, Houston, TX 77030. Tel: (713)-441-4820; Fax: (713)-441-4493

Received 8 April 2009; received in revised form 8 July 2009; accepted 16 July 2009. published online 03 February 2010.

Purpose

To review the existing literature regarding the characteristics, prognostic factors, treatment, and survival of patients with medulloblastoma, who develop extraneural metastasis (ENM).

Methods and Materials

A PubMed search of English language articles from 1961 to 2007 was performed, yielding 47 articles reporting on 119 patients. Factors analyzed included age, time interval to development of ENM, ENM location, central nervous system (CNS) involvement, treatment, and outcome.

Results

Sites of ENM included bone in 84% of patients, bone marrow in 27% of patients, lymph nodes in 15% of patients, lung in 6% of patients, and liver in 6% of patients. Median survival was 8 months after diagnosis of ENM. The 1-, 2-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates after diagnosis of ENM were 41.9%, 31.0%, and 26.0%, respectively. The 1-, 2-, and 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates after diagnosis of ENM were 34.5%, 23.2%, and 13.4%, respectively. For patients without CNS involvement at the time of ENM diagnosis, the 1-, 2-, and 5-year OS rates for those treated with and without radiotherapy (RT) were 82.4%, 64.8%, and 64.8% vs. 51.0%, 36.6%, and 30.5%, respectively (p = 0.03, log-rank test). RT did not significantly improve OS or PFS rates for those with CNS involvement. Concurrent CNS involvement, ENM in the lung or liver, a time interval of <18 months to development of ENM, and a patient age of <16 years at ENM diagnosis were found to be negative prognostic factors for both OS and PFS.

Conclusions

Several prognostic factors were identified for patients with ENM from medulloblastoma. Patients without concurrent CNS involvement, who received RT after ENM diagnosis had an OS and PFS benefit compared to those who did not receive RT.

Medulloblastoma, Extraneural, Extracranial, Metastasis, Radiotherapy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Conflict of interest: none.

PII: S0360-3016(09)02920-4

doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.1729

International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 78, Issue 1 , Pages 72-78, 1 September 2010