International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 78, Issue 1 , Pages 58-63, 1 September 2010

Dose Gradient Near Target–Normal Structure Interface for Nonisocentric CyberKnife and Isocentric Intensity-Modulated Body Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer

  • Sabbir Hossain, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: Sabbir Hossain, Ph.D., Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, 1600 Divisadero St., San Francisco, CA 94143-1708. Tel: (415) 353-7175; Fax: (415) 353-9883
  • ,
  • Ping Xia, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA
  • ,
  • Kim Huang, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA
  • ,
  • Martina Descovich, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA
  • ,
  • Cynthia Chuang, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA
  • ,
  • Alexander R. Gottschalk, M.D., Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA
  • ,
  • Mack Roach III, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA
  • ,
  • Lijun Ma, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA

Received 11 February 2009; received in revised form 8 July 2009; accepted 21 July 2009. published online 03 February 2010.

Purpose

The treatment planning quality between nonisocentric CyberKnife (CK) and isocentric intensity modulation treatment was studied for hypofractionated prostate body radiotherapy. In particular, the dose gradient across the target and the critical structures such as the rectum and bladder was characterized.

Methods and Materials

In the present study, patients treated with CK underwent repeat planning for nine fixed-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) using identical contour sets and dose–volume constraints. To calculate the dose falloff, the clinical target volume contours were expanded 30 mm anteriorly and posteriorly and 50 mm uniformly in other directions for all patients in the CK and IMRT plans.

Results

We found that all the plans satisfied the dose–volume constraints, with the CK plans showing significantly better conformity than the IMRT plans at a relative greater dose inhomogeneity. The rectal and bladder volumes receiving a low dose were also lower for CK than for IMRT. The average conformity index, the ratio of the prescription isodose volume and clinical target volume, was 1.18 ± 0.08 for the CK plans vs. 1.44 ± 0.11 for the IMRT plans. The average homogeneity index, the ratio of the maximal dose and the prescribed dose to the clinical target volume, was 1.45 ± 0.12 for the CK plans vs. 1.28 ± 0.06 for the IMRT plans. The average percentage of dose falloff was 2.9% ± 0.8%/mm for CK and 3.1% ± 1.0%/mm for IMRT in the anterior direction, 3.8% ± 1.6%/mm for CK and 3.2% ± 1.9%/mm for IMRT in the posterior direction, and 3.6% ± 0.4% for CK and 3.6% ± 0.4% for IMRT in all directions.

Conclusion

Nonisocentric CK was as capable of producing equivalent fast dose falloff as high-number fixed-field IMRT delivery.

CyberKnife, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, IMRT, prostate cancer, hypofractionation, stereotactic body radiotherapy, SBRT, dose gradient, dose falloff

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported in part by a research grant from the University of California, San Francisco, Dean's Office and the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation.

 Conflict of interest: none.

PII: S0360-3016(09)02947-2

doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.1752

International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 78, Issue 1 , Pages 58-63, 1 September 2010