Volume 78, Issue 3 , Pages 722-728, 1 November 2010
Brachytherapy in the Treatment of Cholangiocarcinoma
Purpose
To examine the role of brachytherapy in the treatment of cholangiocarcinomas in a relatively large group of patients.
Methods and Materials
Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database, a total of 193 patients with cholangiocarcinoma treated with brachytherapy were identified for the period 1988–2003. The primary analysis compared patients treated with brachytherapy (with or without external-beam radiation) with those who did not receive radiation. To try to account for confounding variables, propensity score and sensitivity analyses were used.
Results
There was a significant difference between patients who received radiation (n = 193) and those who did not (n = 6859) with regard to surgery (p < 0.0001), race (p < 0.0001), stage (p < 0.0001), and year of diagnosis (p <0.0001). Median survival for patients treated with brachytherapy was 11 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 9–13 months), compared with 4 months for patients who received no radiation (p < 0.0001). On multivariable analysis (hazard ratio [95% CI]) brachytherapy (0.79 [0.66–0.95]), surgery (0.50 [0.46–0.53]), year of diagnosis (1998–2003: 0.66 [0.60–0.73]; 1993–1997: (0.96 [0.89–1.03; NS], baseline 1988–1992), and extrahepatic disease (0.84 [0.79–0.89]) were associated with better overall survival.
Conclusions
To the authors' knowledge, this is the largest dataset reported for the treatment of cholangiocarcinomas with brachytherapy. The results of this retrospective analysis suggest that brachytherapy may improve overall survival. However, because of the limitations of the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database, these results should be interpreted cautiously, and future prospective studies are needed.
Cholangiocarcinoma, Brachytherapy, Radiation, Surgery, SEER
To access this article, please choose from the options below
This project was funded, in part, under a grant with the Pennsylvania Department of Health. The Department specifically disclaims responsibility for any analysis, interpretations, or conclusions.
Conflict of interest: none.
PII: S0360-3016(09)03044-2
doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.070
© 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 78, Issue 3 , Pages 722-728, 1 November 2010
