International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 77, Issue 3 , Pages 926-931, 1 July 2010

Standard and Nonstandard Craniospinal Radiotherapy Using Helical TomoTherapy

  • William Parker, M.Sc.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Physics, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests to: William Parker, M.Sc., Department of Medical Physics, McGill University Health Centre, 1650 Cedar Ave., Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3G 1A4. Tel: (514) 934-8052; Fax: (514) 934-8229
  • ,
  • Marylene Brodeur, M.Sc.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Physics, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • ,
  • David Roberge, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • ,
  • Carolyn Freeman, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Received 11 March 2009; received in revised form 12 August 2009; accepted 4 September 2009. published online 15 March 2010.

Purpose

To show the advantages of planning and delivering craniospinal radiotherapy with helical TomoTherapy (TomoTherapy Inc., Madison, WI) by presenting 4 cases treated at our institution.

Methods and Materials

We first present a standard case of craniospinal irradiation in a patient with recurrent myxopapillary ependymoma (MPE) and follow this with 2 cases requiring differential dosing to multiple target volumes. One of these, a patient with recurrent medulloblastoma, required a lower dose to be delivered to the posterior fossa because the patient had been previously irradiated to the full dose, and the other required concurrent boosts to leptomeningeal metastases as part of his treatment for newly diagnosed MPE. The final case presented is a patient with pronounced scoliosis who required spinal irradiation for recurrent MPE.

Results

The four cases presented were planned and treated successfully with Helical Tomotherapy.

Conclusions

Helical TomoTherapy delivers continuous arc–based intensity-modulated radiotherapy that gives high conformality and excellent dose homogeneity for the target volumes. Increased healthy tissue sparing is achieved at higher doses albeit at the expense of larger volumes of tissue receiving lower doses. Helical TomoTherapy allows for differential dosing of multiple targets, resulting in very elegant dose distributions. Daily megavoltage computed tomography imaging allows for precision of patient positioning, permitting a reduction in planning margins and increased healthy tissue sparing in comparison with standard techniques.

Helical TomoTherapy, Craniospinal irradiation, IMRT, Pediatric radiotherapy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Conflict of interest: none.

PII: S0360-3016(09)03213-1

doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.09.020

International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics
Volume 77, Issue 3 , Pages 926-931, 1 July 2010